Will the Grand Canyon Survive?

Last week Change.org contacted us about the Worldwide Campaign to Save the Grand Canyon. Working together with environmental editor, Jess Leber, the petition housed on Change.org was updated with the current urgency in the need of signatures to make this campaign a successful one. With Change.org’s endorsement and promotion of this campaign, the response has been overwhelming. In the last few days, over 34,000 people have spoken out with signatures and comments and demands to stop the mining of uranium in and around the Grand Canyon.

The Grand Canyon is a world treasure for which we in the United States are its caretakers and guardians. Everything must be done to protect it.

A critical development occurred during the preceding months of comments, public hearings and outcries regarding the upcoming expiration of the uranium mining moratorium which is currently protecting the Grand Canyon. In 2009, lawsuits and public outcry helped secure the moratorium for an additional 2 years. In the last couple months, there have been additional initiatives such as letter writing campaigns and public hearings held opposing the allowance of mining to resume.

There is no other place on earth that rivals the Grand Canyon area in grandeur and sheer splendor. It is the signature natural landmark of our nation and is magnificent in so many ways.

Most recently, thanks to an unprecedented and fierce citizen outcry last week, the deadline for public comment was extended an additional 30 days through May 4. This means that now is the time for the most intense, passionate and powerful outcry yet where we could ensure the Canyon stays mine-free for at least another 20 years if we can get the current ban on the table passed to shut the mining lobbyists down.

The Grand Canyon is not only a national treasure, it is an official World Heritage Site and has been one since 1979. See the link: http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/75
Do not jeopardize one of the most amazing natural wonders of the world. The short term gain from mining will come at a cost of spoiling the area for centuries to come. Leave it alone. Continue the ban.

We cannot allow the corporate vultures access to the Grand Canyon. You know it will be destroyed and that just can’t be allowed to happen.

Mining lobbyists are pushing the U.S. Bureau of Land Management to let the digging begin. We must continue to band together – global citizens uniting – and dig in our heals to stop the greedy from causing further unrepairable damage to one of the most incredible natural wonders of the world.

Let us be good stewards of our earth and preserve it as a safe habitat to benefit all life.

The Canyon contains outstanding biological diversity, containing five of the of the seven life zones, including Lower Sonoran, Upper Sonoran, Transition, Canadian and Hudsonian, which is the equivalent of traveling from Mexico to Canada. It is home to numerous rare, endemic (found only at Grand Canyon), and threatened/endangered plant and animal species. The park contains over 1,500 plant, 355 bird, 89 mammalian, 47 reptile, 9 amphibian, and 17 fish species.

The National Park Service already advises against “drinking and bathing” in the Little Colorado River, Kanab Creek, and other Grand Canyon waters where “excessive radionuclides” have been found. Several areas of and surrounding the Grand Canyon have already been declared by the U.S. Forest Service and other national agencies as toxic areas. Water supplies and land have been poisoned by radiation from uranium mining run-off. Human, animal and plant lives and species have been lost and continue to be endangered by the toxic contamination.

We must all ACT NOW to Save the Grand Canyon! Please join us in signing this petition to halt uranium mining in and around the Grand Canyon.

Petitions by Change.org|Start a Petition »

Memorial Tribute to Hugh MacDougall

Memorial Tribute to Hugh MacDougall

“We are sending the power of love, peace and compassion, which can change the world.” — Hugh MacDougall, Australia, SEN Honorary Advisor

Dec 2, 1951 - Jan 28, 2011

Hugh was more to Suzanne and I than SEN’s Honorary Spiritual Advisor. He was the beloved friend we called brother, and he was truly a friend not just to many on Care2, but to every peace-loving person on earth.

More than a gentle giant, he was thoroughly kind, wise, compassionate and loving. Indeed, he was a man of grace and humanitarian divinity.

As Suzanne said to Hugh’s children Ellen and Peter last night, “Hugh will live on forever in our hearts. He has been and always shall be a true inspiration.”

We can find no words in greater tribute to his memory than those he shared with us on Care2 and here on SEN.

We share below a few notable links for our beloved friend and brother, Hugh MacDougall:

Hugh’s message that inspired a prayer chain that circled the world.  http://sen4earth.org/articles/more-you-can-do/hug-spiritual-trees/

Hugh’s profound appeals he subsequently posted on his SEN blog, the last just a short time ago. http://sen4earth.org/spiritual-energy/home/2011/01/circles-and-towers/

Hugh’s personal blog with thoughts, travels and morehttp://www.hughmacdougall.com

God Bless You Hugh and All of the Many Who Loved You Worldwide,

Your Brother Gregory and Your Sister Suzanne

No to Monsanto and GMO: Action Central

Petition Against Gates Foundation Monsanto Investment — MORE BELOW

Target: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Sponsored by: Gregory Hilbert and Sustainability Education Network

WHEREAS Monsanto’s corporate practices and GMO and herbicide products are infamous for their destructive impact on the health of mankind and the sustainability of all life on earth, and WHEREAS the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation represents that it’s mission is to serve the health needs of mankind, WE THE UNDERSIGNED do hereby petition the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to immediately divest itself of its investment of $27 million in Monsanto stock and hereafter cease support of any and all programs associated with Monsanto products. Click below to sign our worldwide petition.

SEN-Care2: Petition Gates to Say No to All Monsanto

Scroll Down For Care2 friend Jytte Nhanenge’s Letter To Accompany Petition

Multiply Your Power, Sign More Petitions Fast!

SEN-Change.org: Tell Obama No to Monsanto GMO

Organic Legion-Care2 Bring Down Monsanto

Organic Consumers-Care2 Prosecute Monsanto

Care2 Worldwide: No GMO on Earth

Avaaz Europeans Only: GMO Moratorium

GoPetition – Tell Monsanto to Leave Kenya

Comment Below to Inform SEN of Other Petitions

Jytte Nhanenge’s Extraordinary Letter Below Will Accompany Our Petition to the Gates Foundation:

To Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Regarding your involvement with Monsanto and Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa

We – the concerned people who have signed this petition – are aware that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation are, via your sponsorship of Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) and your economic cooperation with Monsanto, planning to spread chemical agriculture and genetically modified organisms into the precarious societies and nature of Africa.

Although we assume that your Foundation is supporting this technology in order to alleviate hunger and poverty in Africa, we must respectfullydisagree with your approach, which we find reductionist, purely focusing on technological fixes and economic profit making. This is a limited approach, which we believe cannot give sustainable results. If your Foundation aims to be part of solving global hunger and poverty, we find it necessary that you embrace a holistic approach, hence including in your program concern for women, poor people, and nature.

In the following we would like to explain in detail why we oppose your approach:

While women represent half the global population, one-third of the labor force, and do two-thirds of all working hours, they receive only one-tenth of the world income, and own less than one percent of world property. Owing to this inequality, data show that 70 percent of all absolute poor people are women.

Thus, poverty is a gender related problem. It derives from subordination of women in most societies.

Laws, institutions, social rules, and cultural traditions have throughout history dominated the African women and limited their access to productive resources and markets. Women are also not enjoying much government and donor assistance, and in many places they cannot own land. In spite of these obstacles women are producing 80 percent of the continents food. They are also the main actors in the informal markets from which poor people survive. Due to their prominent role in food production women depend on nature. This relationship has given many Southern women a unique knowledge about their environment. It is an organic and sustainable relation benefitting both: nature helps women to feed their families while women ensure that nature remains healthy and reproductive. This knowledge is diverse, depending on the context, and it has been transmitted from one generation to the next. When the North introduced chemical agriculture and production of cash crop for the formal market, they marginalized women’s food production. The natural resources from which women lived were directed towards cash crop production. This caused scarcity of land for women’s food production resulting in hunger and poverty of women and their children, and degradation of natural resources. Moreover, the purely technological approach from mechanical scientists, dismissed women’s organic agricultural knowledge, which has sustained traditional people and nature for thousands of years.

The “Green Revolution” or chemical agriculture consequently did not benefit women, poor people, and nature. Its mono culture, chemical fertilizer, pesticide, and herbicide, its hybrid seeds and extreme water use via irrigation have had tremendous negative side effects for society and nature. This has been researched by various respected scientists. One is Dr. Vandana Shiva who analyzed the “Green Revolution” in India and published her results in the 1989 book “Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development”.

The dangers of spreading chemicals in nature were also highlighted in the now famous classic book, “Silent Spring”, written by the late American marine biologist Rachel Carson. There is ample additional evidence, which points to chemical agriculture’s inability to sustainably increase yields, while the method oppositely is polluting nature and people: The artificial technologies have caused serious imbalances to the natural eco-system. Chemicals have tainted soils, poisoned ground water, endangered fish, birds, and other animals. Chemicals have indiscriminately killed insects including those that are supportive to healthy plant development, like bees and worms. Chemicals have caused mineral imbalance in soils, which is draining their health and nutrition. Irrigation has introduced too much water into soils causing siltation and salinisation, making soils salty and muddy and hence unfit for agricultural production.

In addition, chemical agriculture has overused water resources and caused alarming shortage of clean water globally. Hence, introduction of the proposed “Green Revolution” will eventually render the precarious African soils infertile; it will dry out Africa’s scarce water sources, and destroy valuable traditional agricultural knowledge.

Agricultural chemicals also make people sick. Many of the toxics enter the human body where they remain in the tissues, because the immune system cannot dispose of them. Some of the chemicals are causing cancer or birth defects, and contributing to numerous health problems. In addition, people are often unaware of how to handle the dangerous chemicals they are using. Due to inadequate technical knowledge pesticide and herbicide kill 10-40,000 people annually in the South. With all these painful side effects carried by society and nature one should at least expect that chemical agriculture could boost crop production, however that is not the case.

Although chemical agriculture initially increased yields, this improvement quickly diminished, and scientists say that the yield now is lower compared to organic farming. The decrease relates to exhaustion in soil nutrition and increased pest attacks. The persistent use of pesticide has caused pests to mutate, developing resistant strains of pest. This increased invasion of pests can cause crop losses of up to 30 percent. Since the chemicals also have killed the pests’ natural predators the mutated pests will require ever more deadly chemicals causing a never ending vicious circle, like drug addiction. Consequently, introduction of chemical agriculture has not led to food security; instead it has caused severe side effects, hence we must doubt the benefit from using chemicals in nature.

Genetically modified organisms (GMO) are an expansion of the “Green Revolution”. Genetic engineering of the seed has made it ecologically incomplete so that it cannot produce alone. It will need help from purchased fertilizer and pesticide. This will increase the need for chemicals in agriculture hence escalating the above mentioned negative side-effects for society and nature. Due to the modification technique used in the laboratory, the GMO foods cause additional health threats.

Research on animals has shown that GMO food combined with their chemicals are causing liver and kidney damage, reproductive dysfunction, sterility, increased infant mortality, food allergies, asthma, and autoimmune diseases, while also having negative effects in heart, adrenal, spleen, and blood cells.

Genetically engineered seeds have been modified in such a way that they cannot reproduce. This is an economic advantage for the corporations because it requires the farmer to buy new seeds for every planting season, together with the necessary chemicals. Making the seed sterile means that farmers can no longer replant their own seeds from previous harvests. They must buy new seeds every season, which puts an end to their ability to develop new crops. This is devastating in the South where farmers grow 80 percent of their crops from saved seeds. When poor farmers cannot store and trade seed, their agricultural production become dependent on expensive seed and chemical implements from agri-businesses. As a result, only those farmers who can afford it will have food, the rest will be marginalized. Modification of seeds has allowed patenting. In this way the agri-businesses maintain a monopoly on resources for food production. Because of this market monopoly GMO seeds and their chemicals are expensive. This has led poor farmers into debt and poverty. You can hardly be unaware of the thousands of crop farmers who have committed suicides in India, due to bankruptcy caused by Monsanto’s monopoly on agricultural technology.

In addition, the GMO crops are eradicating traditional crops. Nature does not operate in neatly separated boxes, thus cross pollination takes place between the GMO plant and traditional crops, which makes the latter sterile. This is disastrous for sustainable food production because it is the traditional crops that have given local people food security for thousands of years keeping both nature and people healthy. In this way, corporations have taken over plant breeding, which is creating the classical conditions for hunger and famine. History has shown that whenever ownership of resources for food production are concentrated in a few hands and the market is in charge of distributing the agricultural products, then we have the foundation for food insecurity. Consequently, hunger and poverty began when modern chemical agriculture entered the South. The shift from an ecological process of sustainable food production, to a technological process of non-renewable production has reduced biological diversity in agriculture; it has increased farmer’s dependency on expensive patented products; and it has created non-sustainability in agriculture, which will lead to hunger and poverty in the South.

There is yet another reason why GMO cannot eradicate world hunger: although the industry has declared that it will feed the world, the promise has proven empty. Experiments show that GM seeds do not increase crop yields radically; they are also not promising for adapting to climate change. According to the report “Failure to Yield” from July 2009 made by Union of Concerned Scientists, GMOs have, despite 20 years of research and 13 years of commercialization, failed significantly to increase US crop yields. It therefore does not make sense to support genetic engineering at the expense of technologies that have proven to substantially increase yields, especially in many developing countries. In addition, recent studies have shown that organic and similar farming methods that minimize the use of pesticides and synthetic fertilizers can more than double crop yields at little cost to poor farmers in developing regions such as Sub-Saharan Africa.

The senior scientist, Dr. Doug Gurian-Sherman concludes that, “If we are going to make headway in combating hunger due to overpopulation and climate change, we will need to increase crop yields; traditional breeding outperforms genetic engineering hands down.”

Research from the Rodale Institute supports these findings. They have an ongoing revolutionary research project that started in 1981 called Farm System Trial (FST) on organic farming. Their research has found that crop yields from organic and chemical farms are similar in years of average precipitation.

However, organic farm yields are higher during droughts and floods, due to stronger root systems in organic plants, and better moisture retention in the soil, which prevents runoff and erosion. The data moreover showed that organic production requires 30 percent less energy than chemical production when growing corn and soybeans; that organic farms create jobs because labor inputs are 15 percent higher; and that the net economic return for organic crops is equal to or higher than that for chemically produced crops because the costs are lower. In addition, organic farming is psychologically and socially supportive because it is labor intensive and community oriented.

The most surprising FST finding of all has been that when soil is cultivated organically its carbon content increases, which contributes to reducing global warming. The carbon increase is so high that if all the cultivated land in the world were farmed organically it would immediately reduce our climate crisis significantly. Organic farming can pull, on an annual basis, thousands of pounds of carbon dioxide per acre right out of the air and keep it in the soil, adding to its carbon stores year after year. Physicist Amory Lovins supports this finding. In his estimates increasing the carbon content of the world’s depleted soils at reasonable rates would absorb about as much carbon as all human activity emits. Conversely, soil farmed by using chemical methods has very little ability to keep or build vital supplies of carbon in the soil. It is oppositely causing global warming. Its nitrogen-based fertilizers are releasing the green house gas nitrous oxide into the atmosphere. Hence, switching to organic food production is the single most critical action we can take right now to stop our climate crisis.

Consequently, organic farming is a relevant, ecological, and holistic technology that would alleviate hunger and poverty. Organic farms are small and owner operated. Farmers sell their products at local markets with a short distance from the farm to the table, saving energy, packing, and at the same time maintaining the food fresh and healthy. Finally, organic farming is successful and efficient. An agroecological project involving 730,000 farm households across Africa resulted in yield improvements of between 50-100 percent. In addition, it decreased production costs while increasing cash incomes up to as much as ten times. Thus, organic farming raises production, gives ecological and social benefits, and it empower farmers, most of whom are women.

In order to give a holistic understanding, it is important to add that hunger is not caused by global food shortage. According to Frances Moore Lappé and her colleagues at the Institute for Food and Development Policy in USA, the reasons for hunger are political. According to her book from 1986, “World Hunger: Twelve Myths” there is enough food supply for all in our world. Increase of food supply has, in the last fifty years, kept ahead of population growth in every region of the world, except Africa. Research also shows that there is no direct relationship between the prevalence of hunger and a country’s population size. Moreover, 78 percent of all malnourished children in the South live in countries with food surpluses. Many of these countries export more agricultural goods than they import. The root causes of hunger are consequently unrelated to food production. Poverty, inequality, and lack of access to food and land are the primary causes of famine. People are hungry because the economic and political elite control the means of producing and distributing food. Thus, world hunger is not a problem that can be solved by chemical technology and GMO; it comes from lack of democracy and economic equality.

If we do not address the root causes – which relate to domination – hunger and poverty will continue no matter which technology we apply. We consequently do not need a “Green Revolution” in Africa. Organic farming methods are more likely to support women, poor people, and nature, and to keep women and poor people in control of productive resources. Therefore, if we should hope to alleviate hunger and poverty control over resources for food production need to return into the hands of the food producers, most of whom are women. They must be empowered to grow their own food by choosing their own technology and using their own knowledge.

This should be supported rather than subordinated.

Conclusively if your Foundation would support women’s organic agriculture it would have the following positive, systemic ripple and trickle-down effects: increase agricultural production, ensure food sustainability, eradicate hunger and thus poverty, improve health of women and children hence reducing child mortality, diminish women’s reproduction thus putting a halt to global population expansion, reduce global warming hence arresting climate change, increase human productivity, make people independent and content, which is boosting social cohesion leading to limitation in crime and violence, sustain a healthy nature with fertile soils and clean waters, which will be supporting life of people and animals, empower women, leading to gender equality, freedom, and democracy. In conclusion, a holistic approach to food production will bring about sustainability and an overall increase in the quality of life for women, poor people, and nature. If the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation would follow this path, you would place your names in the history books as people who truly made a difference in our world.

Oppositely if your Foundation supports AGRA’s and Monsanto’s chemical agriculture and GMO, you may not be part of the solution to hunger and poverty. Your Foundation may oppositely become yet another dominant institution, which is subordinating women and poor people, while exploiting nature by controlling people’s productive resources preventing them from becoming self-sufficient. Since the technology Monsanto is promoting has proven to be dangerous to society and nature, supporting Monsanto economically means that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation indirectly and hopefully unintentionally may harm Africa’s precious people and priceless nature. We therefore urge you to reconsider your support to AGRA and Monsanto, and instead follow a holistic and sustainable strategy for hunger and poverty alleviation.

A holistic development strategy includes not only quantitative economic and technical issues; it needs to integrate concerns for a quality of life for society and nature. History has shown that formal markets, economic growth, and chemical agriculture have failed to alleviate hunger and poverty; we therefore need to try alternative strategies. I would enjoy sharing such an alternative perception with your Foundation.

At the beginning of next year the University Press of America will be publishing my book, “Ecofeminism: Towards Integrating the Concerns of Women, Poor people, and Nature into Development”, which is based on my Masters Degree dissertation obtained at University of South Africa. The book presents a complex critique of the present reductionist, purely economic oriented development strategy.

It is showing that a holistic perception of reality is more likely to end the global crises of poverty, violence, natural destruction, and human rights abuses. As soon as the book is out from print, I will, via the publisher, forward the book to you as a gift. I sincerely hope that the content of the book in some ways will inspire your ongoing work with global hunger and poverty alleviation in the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Yours Respectfully,

On behalf of the petition sponsor

Sustainability Education Network, USA, Gregory Hilbert and Suzanne Sparling, CoFounders

And all those who have signed this petition

Mrs. Jytte Nhanenge

C.P. 258, Chimoio, Mozambique; BA Development Studies and Philosophy, Hons BA Philosophy, MA Development Studies

SEN applauds Care2 friends Jytte Nhanenge (above) and Kathy Beavin (at right, who on Care2  is known by the avatar next to the Monsanto article below) for their contributions to this campaign and their many efforts for the sake of humankind. Kathy Beaven is a Care2 leader in the fight against Monsanto and GMO.

Warning: Monsanto Herbicides

Americans are becoming aware of the dangers of genetically modified organisms (GMO) foods, but most don’t know that scientists have created GMO crops specifically designed to be resistant to weed killer. This allows farmers to use weed killers at higher concentrations, and in theory, be able to control weeds more easily. It’s a win-win for big corporations: They can sell the special seed each season, and then sell a lot more weed killer.

Recent studies have found much higher concentrations of weed killers in these crops. This is important because weed killers and other pesticides are associated with a number of very deadly diseases, the main one being cancer. Weed killers, unlike many pesticides, extend to millions of homes, golf courses, and public facilities.

A growing number of carefully conducted studies are showing that weed killers may produce significant damage to human DNA, mitochondria, and especially immune cells. Worst of all, they may do so in doses far below that found in agricultural use.

A study from a French laboratory in 2009 reported in the journal Toxicology found that weed killers produced gene damage and concluded that weed killers should be considered carcinogens. Further, they accumulate in food, animal feed, and the environment.

Other pesticides are also linked to a high incidence of cancer, especially lymphomas.

From the late 1970s until 1992, there was a 50 percent increase in lymphoma, with the greatest incidence occurring in the farm belt of the Midwest. As far back as 1981, a study from Sweden found that there was a sixfold increase in malignant lymphoma in those exposed to herbicides. Another highly fatal cancer, multiple myeloma, may also be linked to weed killers. More at http://www.newsmaxhealth.com/dr_blaylock/GMO_pesticides/2010/09/09/348541.html?s=al&promo_code=AB57-1

Click for Greenpeace Video Expose of Monsanto

“SEN is greatly concerned that Monsanto and GMO give rise to a threat that if unchecked could eventually prove as catastrophic to mankind and the sustainability of all life on earth as global warming. We must scream bloody murder, and do so with facts.” — Gregory Hilbert, Co-Founder Sustainability Education Network

“SEN welcomes the voices of others who share our concerns and goals. Please use the comment box below if you have a petition or website or article to which you’d like SEN to post a link on this page. Most comments are posted within 1 to 12 hours.” — Suzanne Sparling, CoFounder Sustainability Education Network

Drill Us to Hell? Say What YOU Demand!

Drill Oil and USA & World to Hell?

Tell Us and Them What YOU want!

The USA and world will soon be out of oil regardless. Consequences of too little too late. Links for more info and ACTION. Click here to tell us what you demand.

 

The Energy and Climate Bill being debated in the USA is at risk of passing as a doom-delivering failure, on the heels of the failure of world leaders at Copenhagen to commit their nations to urgent and decisive action. Worse, like Health Reform, the legislative and political process will make it difficult to know the bill’s ever-shifting details.

We at SEN are convinced that in any event, the USA energy and climate bill is at risk of being “FAR too little, FAR too late, FAR too much wrong, FAR too little right”. The very expression “Drill baby drill!” reflects the drooling of a wealthy few. “Clean coal” and nuclear are not solutions in our view. They are costly and deadly risks at best. How many other nations will join our death-defying and oil-drilling march to hell?

We asked ourselves what could we contribute, given our conviction, based on ample proof, that we are facing a catastrophic exhaustion of many global resources. All converging in the range of 2025-2050. We are saying what many know but do not say: if we do not change course urgently and decisively, the earth will necessarily begin purging billions in the lifetimes of our children. It will do so even if we do not have the catastrophic global warming toward which we are already steadily marching. And so, SEN’s contribution to the collective effort in which many individuals and organizations are now engaged will be as follows:

Click here for the outcome of “too little too late”

Click for facts: the USA & world will soon be out of oil

Click here to say what YOU demand, we’ll tell THEM

Scroll down for tools & links for further info & ACTION

Here’s What We Think

The American Petroleum Institute — the oil industry lobby – says that if we would lift all environmental restrictions and allow them to drill everywhere, there’s enough oil in the USA and offshore to fuel 60 million cars and trucks for 60 years. They don’t tell you there are already over 250 million vehicles in the USA, and in ten years there’ll be 275 million. That means the USA has enough to be independent of foreign oil for 13 years before it’s all gone in 2023. Then what?

And they don’t tell you that each year the extraction costs will rise sharply as the cheap-to-extract oil is exhausted. Nor do lobbyists warn you how much corporate Big Oil will want to charge hostage Americans per gallon as it drills itself out of business, so execs can pay themselves huge bonuses and retire early in the style to which they will have grown very accustomed, the same style the wealthiest shareholders always had.  If you or your adult children have a job in 10 years, do you think you or they can make ends meet driving to work paying $24.999 per gallon?

Will you smile and say, “Well, at least I’m not paying $25.00 a gallon”?

And how would you feel if in 2020, ten years from now, as you are driving to work grateful to have a job despite being delinquent two months on your mortgage or rent and thus facing eviction or foreclosure, if you hear a news flash on the radio something like this:

We interrupt our programming to report this breaking news:  A U.S. invasion force until now secret has landed in Venezuela. Special forces are reportedly seizing its oil fields. In response, Russia and Iran have announced a pact, and Iranian forces are reportedly mobilizing along Iran’s borders with Iraq and Kuwait. China’s UN Ambassador has condemned these actions and warned China will use nuclear weapons to enforce its right of access to world oil supplies. In his statement he said China’s invasion of Taiwan is imminent and that Japan would be annihilated if the U.S. so much as threatened to interfere. We are standing by for an emergency press conference at the White House.”

And if you doubt Global Warming (aka Climate Change science), how would you feel if, as you bicycled to work five years later in 2025, just 15 years from now, after the oil wars were over, after your son or grandson had been killed in Venezuela or Iraq, if you saw a big-screen TV in a Walmart Thrift store window (commonplace then because most could not afford cable or satellite), and you pulled over upon seeing a throng gathered around it, this is what you heard on the news:

“Grain prices soared again today as Brazil and India announced forecasts of even lower crop yields than previously feared. India’s national radio reported that the aquifer underlying yet another growing region is nearly depleted, producing only trickles of irrigation water insufficient to overcome the region’s drought. Brazil’s government blamed  shortages of fertilizer for falling yields in the vast tracts of rain forest cleared for soy bean crops. The report sent ethanol prices sharply higher, despite passage yesterday of emergency funding for permaculture ethanol production using drought-resistant grass grown on ranches no longer able to sustain cattle. Industry analysts say the funding will have no significant impact on supplies for nearly a decade. While Con-Agra, Monsanto, SolarTech and most clean energy stock prices gained on the news, the DJIA fell below 3,000 early this morning as Wall Street reacted to worse-than expected food crop and energy prices, and worry over a possible re-default by the European Economic Union. In Washington, the Senate Climate Emergency Committee will hold its third day of hearings. Yesterday the committee heard the testimony of corporation executives under investigation for carbon credit frauds estimated to involve over $2.6 trillion in largely bogus credits over a ten-year period.  Newly-elected Green Party President Michael Moore said the fraud was even greater in scale than the banking cartel frauds decades ago in which wealthy bank investors and executives pocketed hundreds of billions of tax-payer funds over a 20-year period, helping send the U.S. into its ongoing economic fall and political chaos as global resources declined. Moore was quoted as saying:”

“The biggest one-year bonus any mega-bank CEO got back then was only $100 million. Said he was doing God’s work. CapAndTrade Inc’s CEO Sarah Palin got one bonus of $1.5 Billion for 6 months of 2019 alone. Must think God works for her. Sure, we’ll prosecute her and put her in jail, and we’ll recover a few hundred million. But look, the real disaster is that all this time many thought the carbon credit trading system was helping get emissions down or sequestered.  I take no satisfaction saying “I told you so”. Now everybody knows why emissions soared past 550 PPM in 2020. It wasn’t all China. And now everybody knows global warming is as real as the earth not being flat but round, and they know why. But NOBODY knows if we can do more than save a few hundred million worldwide from the consequences we are only beginning to suffer here in the States. And we can’t eat the damn coal. God have mercy on us. We brought this on ourselves, and greed and ignorance heaped it on.”

 

Links to More Information and Action

Take SEN’s Pledge to Sustainability

350.org

Union of Concerned Scientists

Greenpeace

Clean Energy Petitions on Care2

Clean Energy Petition on Change.org

Green Party USA and Worldwide

Green Party on Care2

Defenders of Wildlife

Greenhouse Neutral Foundation

Green Education Network, Keyword Search Any Topic

Carbon Credits Cap and Trade on Wiki

Google of Energy and Climate Bill

SEN Condemns Environmental Defense Fund

Think! Zero Population Growth

More Coming, Comment Below to Nominate!

SEN wishes to honor here two we know selflesslessy dedicated to humanity and sustainability for all life: Barbara & Dan Costello Dare to Dream Network

 

Hemp and Sustainability

Hemp, Sustainability, and Christmas

The article below from Wikipedia is about industrial hemp, ie non-pyschoactive varieties of Cannabis which in the U.S. suffer misguided restrictions for being confused with psychoactive varieties of Cannabis. We were prompted to post it by SEN Patron and Advisor Mark May, who called our attention to the many and surprising applications of  industrial hemp (ie non-pyschoactive varieties of cannabis) to the needs of sustainability.

The enlightened reader will note that unlike Mark, the compilers of the Wikipedia information below do not discuss the potential of hemp in light of future economics, when today’s unsustainable models and practices cannot govern. We are grateful to Mark for his focus on pioneering for the future of all humankind, for his personal support and sustaining contributions, for his championing of permaculture ethanol, and for his unflagging determination to make a difference. He does.

He reminds us why we celebrate on December 25. The paths to sustainability and salvation demand pursuit of the same humanitarian compassion, even if our own efforts fall short of that writ so large two thousand years ago. Every footstep we take on that caring path inspires the step of another, just as the footsteps of Mark and others like him inspire us. May the warmth and cheer of Christmas visit Mark often — as his did us in 2011 –in every season of the coming year. May it visit all with a foot on the path of compassion, and may you be among them! – Gregory and Suzanne, December 20, 2011

Hemp

Hemp (from Old English hænep) is mostly used as a name for low tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) strains of the plant Cannabis sativa, of fiber and/or oilseed varieties. In modern times, hemp has been used for industrial purposes including paper, textiles, biodegradable plastics, construction, health food and fuel[1] with modest commercial success.[2][3] Since 2007, commercial success of hemp food products has grown considerably.[4][5]

Hemp is one of the faster growing biomasses known,[6] producing up to 25 tonnes of dry matter per hectare per year.[7] A normal average yield in large scale modern agriculture is about 2.5–3.5 t/ac (air dry stem yields of dry, retted stalks per acre at 12% moisture). Approximately, one tonne of bast fiber and 2–3 tonnes of core material can be decorticated from 3–4 tonnes of good quality, dry retted straw.[8][9]

For a crop, hemp is very environmentally friendly as it requires few pesticides, when not grown industrially[10] and no herbicides.[11] Results indicate that high yield of hemp may require high total nutrient levels (field plus fertilizer nutrients) similar to a high yielding wheat crop.[12]

Hemp is one of the earliest domesticated plants known.[13] Cannabis sativa L. subsp. sativa var. sativa is the variety grown for industrial use, while C. sativa subsp. indica generally has poor fiber quality and is primarily used for production of recreational and medicinal drugs. The major difference between the two types of plants is the appearance and the amount of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) secreted in a resinous mixture by epidermal hairs called glandular trichomes, although they can also be distinguished genetically.[14] Oilseed and fiber varieties of Cannabis approved for industrial hemp production produce only minute amounts of this psychoactive drug, not enough for any physical or psychological effects. Typically, hemp contains below 0.3% THC, while cultivars of Cannabis grown for marijuana can contain anywhere from 2% to over 20%.[15]

The world leading producer of hemp is China with smaller production in Europe, Chile and North Korea.[16] While more hemp is exported to the United States than to any other country, the United States Government does not consistently distinguish between marijuana and the non-psychoactive Cannabis used for industrial and commercial purposes.[15]

Many Uses

Hemp is used for a wide variety of purposes including the manufacture of cordage of varying tensile strength, durable clothing and nutritional products [and biofuel and insulation]. The bast fibers can be used in 100% hemp products, but are commonly blended with other organic fibers such as flax, cotton or silk, for apparel and furnishings, most commonly at a 55%/45% hemp/cotton blend. The inner two fibers of hemp are more woody and are more often used in non-woven items and other industrial applications, such as mulch, animal bedding and litter. The oil from the fruits (“seeds”) oxidizes (commonly, though inaccurately, called “drying”) to become solid on exposure to air, similar to linseed oil, and is sometimes used in the manufacture of oil-based paints, in creams as a moisturizing agent, for cooking, and in plastics. Hemp seeds have been used in bird seed mix as well.[17] Hempseed is also used as a fishing bait.[18]

Fuel

Biofuels, such as biodiesel and alcohol fuel, can be made from the oils in hemp seeds and stalks, and the fermentation of the plant as a whole, respectively. Biodiesel produced from hemp is sometimes known as “hempoline”.[51] Hemp is clean burning and non-toxic.

Filtered hemp oil can be used directly to power diesel engines. In 1892, Rudolf Diesel invented the diesel engine, which he intended to fuel “by a variety of fuels, especially vegetable and seed oils, which earlier were used for oil lamps, i.e. the Argand lamp.”[52][53][54]

Food

Hemp seeds can be eaten raw, ground into a meal, sprouted, made into hemp milk (akin to soy milk), prepared as tea,[19] and used in baking. The fresh leaves can also be eaten in salads. Products include cereals, frozen waffles, hemp tofu, and nut butters. A few companies produce value added hemp seed items that include the seed oils, whole hemp grain (which is sterilized by law in the United States, where they import it from China and Canada), dehulled hemp seed (the whole seed without the mineral rich outer shell), hemp flour, hemp cake (a by-product of pressing the seed for oil) and hemp protein powder. Hemp is also used in some organic cereals, for non-dairy milk[20] somewhat similar to soy and nut milks, and for non-dairy hemp “ice cream.”

Within the UK, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has treated hemp as purely a non-food crop. Seed appears on the UK market as a legal food product, and cultivation licenses are available for this purpose. In North America, hemp seed food products are sold, typically in health food stores or through mail order. The United States Department of Agriculture estimates that “the market potential for hemp seed as a food ingredient is unknown. However, it probably will remain a small market, like those for sesame and poppy seeds.”[21]

A survey in 2003 showed that more than 95% of hemps seed sold in the EU was used for animal feed (bird seed, bait for fishing).[9]

Approximately 44% of the weight of hempseed is healthy edible oils, containing about 80% essential fatty acids (EFAs); i.e., linoleic acid, omega-6 (LA, 55%), alpha-linolenic acid, omega-3 (ALA, 22%), in addition to gamma-linolenic acid, omega-6 (GLA, 1–4%) and stearidonic acid, omega-3 (SDA, 0–2%). Proteins (including edestin) are the other major component (33%), second only to soy (35%). Hempseeds amino acid profile is close to “complete” when compared to more common sources of proteins such as meat, milk, eggs and soy.[23] The proportions of linoleic acid and alpha-linolenic acid in one tablespoon (15 ml) per day of hemp oil easily provides human daily requirements for EFAs. Unlike flaxseed oil, hemp oil can be used continuously without developing a deficiency or other imbalance of EFAs.[24] This has been demonstrated in a clinical study, where the daily ingestion of flaxseed oil decreased the endogenous production of GLA.[24]

Hempseed is usually very safe for those unable to tolerate nuts, gluten, lactose, and sugar. In fact, there are no known allergies to hemp foods.Hempseed contains no gluten and therefore would not trigger symptoms of celiac disease.

Dietary supplement

Hemp oil has been shown to relieve the symptoms of eczema (atopic dermatitis).[25]

Hemp Seed contains a large dietary supplement of omega-3, higher even than walnuts which contain 6.3% of n-3.

Medicine

Hemp oil has anti-inflammatory properties.[26] Also see Medicinal cannabis in Wikipedia.

Fiber

The fiber is a valuable part of the hemp plant. It is commonly called bast, which refers to the fibers that grow on the outside of the woody interior of the plant’s stalk, and under the outer most part (the bark). Bast fibers give the plants strength. Hemp fibers can be between approximately 0.91 m (3 ft) and 4.6 m (15 ft) long, running the length of the plant. Depending on the processing used to remove the fiber from the stem, the hemp may naturally be creamy white, brown, gray, black or green.[citation needed]

Building Material

Concrete-like blocks made with hemp and lime have been used as an insulating material for construction. Such blocks are not strong enough to be used for structural elements; they must be supported by a brick, wood, or steel frame.[29]

The first example of the use of hempcrete was in 1986 in France with the renovation of the Maison de la Turque in Nogent-sur-Seine by the innovator Charles Rasetti.[30] The Renewable House was the UK’s first home made from hemp-based materials.[31] Construction was completed in 2009. The first US home made of hemp-based materials was completed in August 2010 in Asheville, North Carolina.[32]

The use of hemp for fiber production has declined sharply over the last two centuries, but before the industrial revolution, hemp was a popular fiber because it is strong and grows quickly; it produces roughly 10% more fiber than cotton or flax when grown on the same land. Hemp has been used to make paper. It was often used to make sail canvas, and the word canvas derives from cannabis.[27][28] Abaca, or “Manila hemp”, a relative of the banana plant, replaced its use for rope. Burlap, made from jute, took over the sacking market. The paper industry began using wood pulp. The carpet industry switched over to wool, sisal, and jute, then nylon. Netting and webbing applications were taken over by cotton and synthetics.

Hemp Plastic and Composite Materials

Hemp is used to make biodegradable plastic. A mixture of fibreglass, hemp fiber, kenaf, and flax has been used since 2002 to make composite panels for automobiles.[4][33] The choice of which bast fiber to use is primarily based on cost and availability.

Paper

The first identified coarse paper, made from hemp, dates to the early Western Han Dynasty, two hundred years before the nominal invention of papermaking by Cai Lun, who improved and standardized paper production using a range of inexpensive materials, including hemp ends, approximately 2000 years ago.[34]

In 1916, U.S. Department of Agriculture chief scientists Lyster Hoxie Dewey and Jason L. Merrill created paper made from hemp pulp, they concluded that paper from hemp hurds was “favorable in comparison with those used with pulp wood.”[35][36] Modern research has not confirmed the positive finding about hemp hurds. They are only 32% and 38% cellulose.[37] The actual production of hemp fiber in the U.S continued to decline until 1933 to around 500 tons/year. Between 1934-35, the cultivation of hemp began to increase but still at a very low level and with no significant increase of paper from hemp.[38][39]

Hemp has never been used for commercial high-volume paper production due to its relatively high processing cost.[40] Currently there is a small niche market for hemp pulp, for example as cigarette paper.[41] Hemp fiber is mixed with fiber from other sources than hemp. In 1994 there was no significant production of 100% true hemp paper.[42] World hemp pulp production was believed to be around 120,000 tons per year in 1991 which was about 0.05% of the world’s annual pulp production volume.[2] The total world production of hemp fiber had in 2003 declined to about 60 000 to 80 000 ton.[41] This can be compared to a typical pulp mill for wood fiber, which is never smaller than 250,000 tons per annum.[42][43] The cost of hemp pulp is approximately six times that of wood pulp,[2] mostly because of the small size and outdated equipment of the few hemp processing plants in the Western world, and because hemp is harvested once a year (during August) and needs to be stored to feed the mill the whole year through. This storage requires a lot of (mostly manual) handling of the bulky stalk bundles. Another issue is that the entire hemp plant cannot be economically prepared for paper production. While the wood products industry uses nearly 100% of the fiber from harvested trees, only about 25% of the dried hemp stem — the bark, called bast — contains the long, strong fibers desirable for paper production.[44] All this accounts for a high raw material cost. Hemp pulp is bleached with hydrogen peroxide, a process today also commonly used for wood pulp.

Fabric, Jewelry and Cordage

A modest hemp fabric industry exists, and hemp fibers can be used in clothing.[45] Pure hemp has a texture similar to linen.[46] Hemp jewelry is the product of knotting hemp twine through the practice of macramé. Hemp jewelry includes bracelets, necklaces, anklets, rings, watches and other adornments. Some jewelry features beads made from glass, stone, wood and bones. The hemp twine varies in thickness and comes in a variety of colors. There are many different stitches used to create hemp jewelry, however, the half knot and full knot stitches are most common.

Hemp rope was used in the age of sailing ships, though the rope had to be protected by tarring, since hemp rope has a propensity for breaking from rot, as the capillary effect of the rope-woven fibers tended to hold liquid at the interior, while seeming dry from the outside.[47] Tarring was a labor-intensive process, and earned sailors the nickname “Jack Tar”. Hemp rope was phased out when Manila, which does not require tarring, became widely available. Manila is sometimes referred to as Manila hemp, but is not related to hemp; it is abacá, a species of banana.

Animal bedding

Hemp shives are the core of the stem, hemp hurds are broken parts of the core. In the EU, they are used for animal bedding (horses, for instance), or for horticultural mulch.[48] Industrial hemp is much more profitable if both fibers and shives (or even seeds) can be used.

Water and soil purification

Hemp can be used as a “mop crop” to clear impurities out of wastewater, such as sewage effluent, excessive phosphorus from chicken litter, or other unwanted substances or chemicals. Eco-technologist Dr. Keith Bolton from Southern Cross University in Lismore, New South Wales, Australia, is a leading researcher in this area. Hemp is being used to clean contaminants at Chernobyl nuclear disaster site.[49]

Weed control

Hemp, because of its height, dense foliage and its high planting density as a crop, is a very effective and long used method of killing tough weeds in farming by minimizing the pool of weed seeds of the soil.[50] Using hemp this way can help farmers avoid the use of herbicides, to help gain organic certification and to gain the benefits of crop rotation per se. Due to its rapid, dense growth characteristics, in some jurisdictions hemp is considered a prohibited noxious weed, much like Scotch Broom.

Cultivation

The map at left shows the regions having climates suitable for hemp cultivation.

Millennia of selective breeding have resulted in varieties that look quite different. Also, breeding since circa 1930 has focused quite specifically on producing strains which would perform very poorly as sources of drug material. Hemp grown for fiber is planted closely, resulting in tall, slender plants with long fibers. Ideally, according to Britain’s Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, the herb should be harvested before it flowers. This early cropping is done because fiber quality declines if flowering is allowed and, incidentally, this cropping also pre-empts the herb’s maturity as a potential source of drug material. However, in these strains of industrial hemp the tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content would have been very low, regardless.

The name Cannabis is the genus and was the name favored by the 19th century medical practitioners who helped to introduce the herb’s drug potential to modern English-speaking consciousness. Cannabis for non-drug purposes (especially ropes and textiles) was then already well known as hemp.

The name “marijuana” is Spanish in origin and associated almost exclusively with the herb’s drug potential.

Historical Cultivation

Hemp has been grown for millennia in Asia and the Middle East for its fibre. Commercial production of hemp in the West took off in the eighteenth century, but was grown in the sixteenth century in eastern England.[55] Because of colonial and naval expansion of the era, economies needed large quantities of hemp for rope and oakum. Other important producing countries were China, North Korea, Hungary, the former Yugoslavia, Romania, Poland, France and Italy.

In Western Europe, nobody banned the cultivation of hemp in the 1930s but the commercial cultivation ceased almost anyhow in the decades after the 1930s. Hemp was simply ousted by artificial fibres.[56]

From the 1950s to the 1980s, the Soviet Union was the world’s largest producer (3,000 km² in 1970). The main production areas were in Ukraine,[57] the Kursk and Orel regions of Russia, and near the Polish border. Since its inception in 1931, the Hemp Breeding Department at the Institute of Bast Crops in Hlukhiv (Glukhov), Ukraine, has been one of the world’s largest centers for developing new hemp varieties, focusing on improving fiber quality, per-hectare yields, and low THC content.[58][59]

In Japan, hemp was historically used as paper and a fiber crop. There is archaeological evidence cannabis was used for clothing and the seeds were eaten in Japan back to the Jōmon period (10,000 to 300 BCE). Many Kimono designs portray hemp, or asa (Japanese: 麻), as a beautiful plant. In 1948, marijuana was restricted as a narcotic drug. The ban on marijuana imposed by the United States authorities was alien to Japanese culture, as the drug had never been widely used in Japan before. Though these laws against marijuana are some of the world’s strictest, allowing five years imprisonment for possession of the drug, they exempt hemp growers, whose crop is used to make robes for Buddhist monks and loincloths for sumo wrestlers. Because marijuana use in Japan has doubled in the past decade, these “loopholes” have recently been called into question.[60]

Yield in Modern Agriculture

Air dry stem yields in Ontario have from 1998 and onward ranged from 2.6-14.0 tonnes of dry, retted stalks per hectare (1-5.5 t/ac) at 12% moisture. Yields in Kent County, have averaged 8.75 t/ha (3.5 t/ac). Northern Ontario crops averaged 6.1 t/ha (2.5 t/ac) in 1998. Only a part of that is bast fiber. Approximately one tonne of bast fiber and 2-3 tonnes of core material can be decorticated from 3-4 tonnes of good quality, dry retted straw.[8] For an annual yield of this level is it in Ontario recommended to add Nitrogen (N):70–110 kg/ha, Phosphate (P2O5): up to 80 kg/ha and Potash (K2O): 40–90 kg/ha.[8] The average yield of dry hemp stalks in Europe was 6 ton/ha (2.4 ton/ac) in 2001 and 2002.[9]

FAO argue that an optimum yield of hemp fiber is more than 2 tonnes per ha, while average yields are around 650 kg/ha.[16]

There are a lot of very uncertain, easily misleading and sometimes clearly incorrect numbers about the yield from hemp in ton/hectare or pounds/acre etc. on the Internet. Frequently it is not specified if the numbers describe: the total biomass; the total yield of biomass; the total yield of dried stalk; or the total yield of fiber from the bark. Furthermore, it is frequently not specified whether the numbers measure wet or dry material. Hemp can contain a lot of water. [61] In modern industrial agriculture about 42% of the plants’ biomass is returned to the soil in the form of leaves, roots and tops.[8]

Harvesting

Thick stands of fiber hemp compete well with weeds. Smallholder plots are usually harvested by hand. The plants are cut at 2 to 3 cm above the soil and left on the ground to dry. Mechanical harvesting is now common, using specially adapted cutter-binders or simpler cutters.

The cut hemp is laid in swathes to dry for up to four days. This was traditionally followed by retting, either water retting (the bundled hemp floats in water) or dew retting (the hemp remains on the ground and is affected by the moisture in dew, and by molds and bacterial action). Modern processes use steam and machinery to separate the fiber, a process known as Thermomechanical pulping.

Varieties

There are broadly three groups of Cannabis varieties being cultivated today:

Varieties primarily cultivated for their fiber, characterized by long stems and little branching, extreme red, yellow, blue or purple coloration, or thickness of stem and solid core, such as hemp Cannabis oglalas, and more generally called industrial hemp.

Varieties grown for hemp seed oil which is high in protein and essential fatty acids and has no psychoactive properties.

Varieties grown for medicinal, spiritual development or recreational purposes.

A nominal, if not legal distinction is often made between hemp, with concentrations of the psychoactive chemical THC far too low to be useful as a drug, and Cannabis used for medical, recreational, or spiritual purposes.

History

In Taiwan, the use of hemp has been shown to go back at least 10,000 years.[62] Hemp use archaeologically dates back to the Neolithic Age in China, with hemp fiber imprints found on Yangshao culture pottery dating from the 5th century BC.[63][62] The Chinese later used hemp to make clothes, shoes, ropes, and an early form of paper.[62] The classical Greek historian Herodotus (ca. 480 BC) reported that the inhabitants of Scythia would often inhale the vapors of hemp-seed smoke, both as ritual and for their own pleasurable recreation.[64] Textile expert Elizabeth Wayland Barber summarizes the historical evidence that Cannabis sativa, “grew and was known in the Neolithic period all across the northern latitudes, from Europe (Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Romania, the Ukraine) to East Asia (Tibet and China),” but, “textile use of Cannabis sativa does not surface for certain in the West until relatively late, namely the Iron Age.”[65] “I strongly suspect, however, that what catapulted hemp to sudden fame and fortune as a cultigen and caused it to spread rapidly westwards in the first millennium B.C. was the spread of the habit of pot-smoking from somewhere in south-central Asia, where the drug-bearing variety of the plant originally occurred. The linguistic evidence strongly supports this theory, both as to time and direction of spread and as to cause.”[66] Jews living in Palestine in the 2nd century were familiar with the cultivation of hemp, as witnessed by a reference to it in the Mishna (Kil’ayim 2:5) as a variety of plant, along with Arum, that sometimes takes as many as three years to grow from a seedling. In late medieval Germany and Italy, hemp was employed in cooked dishes, as filling in pies and tortes, or boiled in a soup.[67]

Hemp in later Europe was mainly cultivated for its fibers, and was used for ropes on many ships, including those of Christopher Columbus. The use of hemp as a cloth was centered largely in the countryside, with higher quality textiles being available in the towns. The Spaniards brought hemp to the Western Hemisphere and cultivated it in Chile starting about 1545.[68] However, in May 1607, “hempe” was among the crops Gabriel Archer observed being cultivated by the natives at the main Powhatan village, where Richmond, Virginia is now situated;[69] and in 1613, Samuell Argall reported wild hemp “better than that in England” growing along the shores of the upper Potomac. As early as 1619, the first Virginia House of Burgesses passed an Act requiring all planters in Virginia to sow “both English and Indian” hemp on their plantations.[70] The Puritans are first known to have cultivated hemp in New England in 1645.[68] In the United States, hemp cultivation is legally prohibited, but during World War II farmers were encouraged to grow hemp for cordage, to replace Manila hemp previously obtained from Japanese-controlled areas. The U.S. government produced a film explaining the uses of hemp, called Hemp for Victory. In 1937, the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937 was passed in the United States. It levied a tax on anyone who dealt commercially in cannabis, hemp, or marijuana. It was repealed by an overriding law in 1970. Hemp was used extensively by the United States during World War II. Uniforms, canvas, and rope were among the main textiles created from the hemp plant at this time.[71] Much of the hemp used was cultivated in Kentucky and the Midwest. Historically, hemp production had made up a significant portion of antebellum Kentucky’s economy. Before the American Civil War, many slaves worked on plantations producing hemp.[72] During World War II, the U.S. produced a short 1942 film, Hemp for Victory, promoting hemp as a necessary crop to win the war. By the early twentieth century, the advent of the steam engine and the diesel engine ended the reign of the sailing ship. The production of iron and steel for cable and ships’ hulls further eliminated natural fibres in marine use. Hemp had long since fallen out of favour in the sailing industry in preference to Manila hemp.

Countries That Produce Hemp

The world-leading producer of hemp is China, with smaller production in Europe, Chile and North Korea. Over 30 countries produce industrial hemp, including Australia, Austria, Canada, Great Britain, France, Russia and Spain.[73]

France is Europe’s biggest producer with 8,000 hectares cultivated. 70-80 % of the hemp fibre produced in Europe in 2003 was used for specialty pulp for cigarette papers and technical applications. About 15% is used in the automotive sector and 5-6% were used for insulation mats. Approximately 95% of hurds were used as animal bedding, while almost 5% were used in the building sector.[9] In 2010/2011 was the total area cultivated with hemp in the EU about 11 000 ha, a decline compared with previous year.[74]

Canada Commercial production (including cultivation) of industrial hemp has been permitted in Canada since 1998 under licenses and authorization issued by Health Canada (9,725 ha in 2004, 5450 ha in 2009).[75][76] The United Kingdom, and Germany all resumed commercial production in the 1990s. British production is mostly used as bedding for horses; other uses are under development. The largest outlet for German fibre is composite automotive panels. Companies in Canada, the UK, the United States and Germany, among many others, process hemp seed into a growing range of food products and cosmetics; many traditional growing countries still continue to produce textile-grade fibre. Uruguay has also approved a project of hemp production as of the second half of 2010.

Hemp is not legal to grow in the U.S. under Federal law because of its relation to marijuana, and any imported hemp products must meet a zero tolerance level. It is considered a controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act (P.L. 91-513; 21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.). Some states have defied Federal law and made the cultivation of industrial hemp legal. These states — North Dakota, Hawaii, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Oregon, California, Montana, West Virginia and Vermont — have not yet begun to grow hemp because of resistance from the federal Drug Enforcement Administration.[77]

Industrial Growth Under Licence

Licences for hemp cultivation are issued in the European Union, Canada, in all states of Australia and ten states in the United States.[78]

In the United Kingdom, these licences are issued by the Home Office under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. When grown for non-drug purposes, hemp is referred to as industrial hemp, and a common product is fibre for use in a wide variety of products, as well as the seed for nutritional aspects and for the oil. Feral hemp or ditch weed is usually a naturalized fibre or oilseed strain of Cannabis that has escaped from cultivation and is self-seeding.

Victoria, Queensland and, most recently, New South Wales issue licences to grow hemp for industrial use. Victoria was an early adopter in 1998, and has reissued the regulation in 2008.[79] Queensland has allowed industrial production under licence since 2002,[80] where the issuance is controlled under the Drugs Misuse Act 1986.[81] Most recently, New South Wales now issues licences[82] under a law, the Hemp Industry Regulations Act 2008 (No 58), that came into effect as of 6 November 2008.[83]

Vermont and North Dakota have passed laws enabling hemp licensure. Both states are waiting for permission to grow hemp from the DEA. Currently,[when?] North Dakota representatives are pursuing legal measures to force DEA approval.[84] Oregon has licensed industrial hemp as of August 2009.[85]

References

^ “Facts About Hemp”. Ecofibre Industries.

^ a b c Van Roekel, Gerjan J. (1994). “Hemp Pulp and Paper Production”. Journal of the International Hemp Association (Wageningen, The Netherlands).

^ Atkinson, Gail (2011). “Industrial Hemp Production in Alberta”. CA: Government of Alberta, Agriculture and Rural Development.

^ a b “Special Report”. CNBC.

^ Lan, Melody (2009-01-17). “Edible, Affordable Indulgences for 2009″. The Wall Street Journal.

^ “The yield of hemp fibre varies from 400 to 2,500 pounds per acre, averaging 1,000 pounds under favorable conditions.” Dewey & Merrrill, Hemp Hurds As Papermaking Material, USDA Bulletin No.404, 1916, p. 3.

^ Struik, P.C.; Amaducci, S.; Bullard, M.J.; Stutterheim, N.C.; Venturi, G.; Cromack, H.T.H. (2000). “Agronomy of fibre hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in Europe”. Industrial Crops and Products 11 (2–3): 107. doi:10.1016/S0926-6690(99)00048-5.

^ a b c d “Growing Industrial Hemp in Ontario, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Canada, 2008″. ON, CA: Omafra. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ a b c d Karus, Michael (2004). European Hemp Industry 2002 Cultivation, Processing and Product Lines. . Journal of Industrial Hemp (London: Taylor & Francis, Informaworld) 9 (2). Retrieved 2011-04-20

^ “FAQs & Facts: Facts”. Resources: Education. The HIA. Retrieved 2008-07-05.

^ “HIA: Resources: Education: FAQs & Facts: FAQs: Answers”. www.thehia.org. Retrieved 2008-07-05.

^ “D. Risula, and others, Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture, October 2009″. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ “Information paper on industrial hemp (industrial cannabis)”. www2.dpi.qld.gov.au. Archived from the original on 2008-07-23. Retrieved 2008-07-05.

^ Datwyler SL, Weiblen GD. Genetic Variation in Hemp and marijuana (Cannabis sativa L.) sativa plants are taller and less dense. Indica plants are shorter but a lot more dense than sativas. According to Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2006; 51(2):371-375. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00061.x

^ a b Hemp and Marijuana: Myths & Realities written by David P. West, Ph.D. for the North American Industrial Hemp Council

^ a b Graeme Thomas. “Natural Fibers: Hemp Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2009″. Naturalfibres2009.org. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ “Erowid Cannabis Vault : Culture #2″. www.erowid.org. Retrieved 2008-06-20.

^ “Vote Industrial Hemp”. http://www.voteindustrialhemp.com/. Retrieved 2007-01-23.

^ “America’s First Hemp Drink – Chronic Ice – Making a Splash in the Natural Beverage Market”. San Francisco Chronicle. Vocus (Los Angeles). 8 June 2011. Retrieved 19 June 2011. “Chronic Ice, the nation’s first drink containing hemp, is making a splash in the healthy beverage market.”

^ “Living Harvest – The Official Website & Online Store – Hemp Seed Nutrition – Unearthing the Benefits of Hemp Seed”. www.worldpantry.com. Retrieved 2008-07-27.

^ http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/ages001E/ages001Eh.pdf

^ “Wilde Country Rancho Hemp Products”. Wcranchohemp.com. Retrieved 2011-11-30.

^ Callaway JC (2004). Hempseed as a nutritional resource: an overview. Euphytica 140:65-72.

^ a b Schwab U, Callaway J, Erkkilä A, Gynther J, Uusitupa M, Järvinen T (2006). Effects of hempseed and flaxseed oils on the profile of serum lipids, serum total and lipoprotein lipid concentrations and haemostatic. European Journal of Nutrition 45(8):470-7.

^ Callaway, JC, Schwab U, Harvimaa I, Halonen P, Mykkänen O, Hyvönen P & Järvinen T (2005). Efficacy of dietary hempseed oil in patients with atopic dermatitis. Journal of Dermatological Treatment 16: 87-94.

^ “Hemp seed oil as an anti-inflammatory”. Schmoo.co.uk. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ “CRRH, Archaeologists agree that cannabis was among the first crops cultivated by human beings at least over 6,000 years ago, and perhaps more than 12,000 years ago”. Crrh.org. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ “Online Etymology Dictionary”. Etymonline.com. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ NNFCC. “NNFCC Project Factsheet: Guide to Building with Hemp-Lime Composites, NNFCC 07-001″, “National Non-Food Crops Centre”, Retrieved on 16 Feb 2011

^ Isabelle, Ceyte (2008) (in French). Etat,acteurs privés et innovation dans le domaine des matériaux de construction écologiques : Le développement du béton de chanvre depuis 1986 (MASTER – Politiques publiques et gouvernements comparés thesis). ‘Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Lyon.

^ “The NNFCC Renewable House”. Renewable-house.co.uk. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ http://content.usatoday.com/communities/greenhouse/post/2010/09/hemp-houses-built-asheville/1

^ Thermoformable Composite Panels. Composites World. 2006.

^ “Cai Lun Improved the Papermaking Technology”. chinaculture.org.

^ Dewey and Merrill, U.S.D.A. Bulletin No. 404, Hemp Hurds as Paper-Making Material, Washington, D.C., October 14, 1916. Page 25

^ “The Project Gutenberg eBook of Hemp Hurds as Paper-Making Material, by Lyster H. Dewey and Jason L. Merrill”. Gutenberg.org. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ “Hayo M.G. van der Werf : Hemp facts and hemp fiction”. Hempfood.com. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ “David P. West: Fiber Wars: The Extinction of Kentucky Hemp”. Gametec.com. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ “Additional Statement of H.J. Anslinger, Commissioner of Narcotics”. Retrieved 2006-03-25.

^ “Valerie L. Vantreese:INDUSTRIAL HEMP:GLOBAL OPERATIONS, LOCAL IMPLICATIONS, Department of Agricultural Economics University of Kentucky, 1998″ (PDF). Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ a b “Michael Karus:European hemp industry 2001 till 2004: Cultivation, raw materials, products and trends, 2005″ (PDF). Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ a b “Steam energy:Hemp Pulp & Paper Production, January 1st 1994″. Hempline.com. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ Anatomy of a Modern Paper Mill, Faculty of Natural Resources Management, Lakehead University

^ Boise: Nonwood Alternatives to Wood Fiber in Paper

^ “Green bedrooms and more: Healthy fabrics for the home”. The Ottawa Citizen. 2008-04-10.

^ Cronin, Mary Elizabeth (1995-02-11). “Hemp fashions are clean, comfy, and legal”. The Free Lance-Star.

^ Schubert, Pit. “Our ropes are much stronger than we believe”. Union Internationale Des Associations D’Alpinisme. Archived from the original on September 27, 2009.

^ NNFCC. “Crop Factsheet: Hemp”, National Non-Food Crops Centre, 2008-06-09. Retrieved on 2009-05-06

^ “Phytoremediation: Using Plants to Clean Soil”. Mhhe.com. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ “Hemp As Weed Control”. www.gametec.com. Retrieved 2008-07-09.

^ “COOLFUEL Episode: Sugarcane and Hempoline”. Retrieved 2009-10-16.

^ “Clean Energy Solutions”. Hemp 4 Fuel. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ “Pollution: Petrol vs. Hemp”. Hempcar.org. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ “Biofuels Facts”. Hempcar.org. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ New Fossil Evidence for the Past Cultivation and Processing of Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in Eastern England Author(s): R. H. W. Bradshaw, P. Coxon, J. R. A. Greig, A. R. Hall Source: New Phytologist, Vol. 89, No. 3 (Nov., 1981), pp. 503-510 Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of the New Phytologist Trust Accessed: 06/07/2009

^ “Dr. Ivan BÛcsa, GATE Agricultural Research Institute, Kompolt – Hungary, Book Review Re-discovery of the Crop Plant Cannabis Marihuana Hemp (Die Wiederentdeckung der Nutzplanze Cannabis Marihuana Hanf)”. Hempfood.com. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ “Hemp research and growing in Ukraine”. Aginukraine.com. 2002-01-06. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ Hemp will help Ukraine to grow wealthy (Russian)

^ Interview with Dr. V. G. Virovets, the head of the Hemp Breeding Department at the Institute of Bast Crops (1998) (English)

^ Yuka Hayashi (2009-03-04). “In Drug-Leery Japan, Arrests for Marijuana Are on the Rise”. Wall Street Journal.

^ “Hayo M.G. van der Werf: Hemp facts and hemp fiction; Dr. Ivan BÛcsa: Book Review of book by Jack Herer, Re-discovery of the Crop Plant Cannabis Marihuana Hemp, GATE Agricultural Research Institute, Kompolt – Hungary”. Hempfood.com. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ a b c Stafford, Peter (1992). Psychedelics Encyclopedia. Berkeley, CA, USA: Ronin Publishing. ISBN 0-914171-51-8.

^ Barber, E. J. W. (1992). Prehistoric Textiles: The Development of Cloth in the Neolithic and Bronze Ages with Special Reference to the Aegean. Princeton University Press. p. 17.

^ Herodotus. Histories. IV. 73–75.

^ Barber, E. J. W. (1992). Prehistoric Textiles: The Development of Cloth in the Neolithic and Bronze Ages with Special Reference to the Aegean. Princeton University Press. p. 18.

^ Barber (1992). p. 19.

^ Regional Cuisines of Medieval Europe: A Book of Essays (2002), edited by Melitta Weiss Adamson ISBN 0-415-92994-6 pg. 98, 166

^ a b “Feasibility of Industrial Hemp Production in the United States Pacific Northwest, SB681″. extension.oregonstate.edu. Retrieved 2008-06-18.

^ Gabriel Archer, A Relatyon of the Discoverie of Our River…, printed in Archaeologia Americana 1860, p. 44. William Strachey (1612) records a native (Powhatan) name for hemp (weihkippeis).

^ Proceedings of the Virginia Assembly, 1619, cf. the 1633 Act: Hening’s Statutes at Large, p. 218

^ Plant Wizards Fight Wartime Drug Peril. 1943. pp. 62–63.

^ James F. Hopkins, “Slavery in the Hemp Industry”, Drug Library

^ “Hemp vs. Marijuana”. azhemp.org. Retrieved 2008-06-18.

^ Jordbruksverket: 2.1–2.3, 2.5 Marknadssituationen för spannmål, oljeväxter, proteingrödor, ris,2011-03-10,(Report from an expert group in the European Union about the market situation for a number of agricultural products. Published only in Swedish)

^ [1][dead link]

^ “Government of Alberta: Industrial Hemp Production in Canada, February 2, 2010″. .agric.gov.ab.ca. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ “Hemp, hemp, hooray: Bill aims to aid farmers with new but controversial crop”. Minnesotaindependent.com. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ “Oregon Passes Hemp Bill”. Retrieved 2009-07-20.[dead link]

^ “Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances (Industrial Hemp) Regulations 2008″ (PDF). www.dms.dpc.vic.gov.au. Retrieved 2008-11-24.

^ “Guidelines for engaging in the commercial production of industrial hemp in Queensland”. dpi.qld.gov.au. Retrieved 2008-11-24.[dead link]

^ “Drugs Misuse Act 1986″ (PDF). www.legislation.qld.gov.au. Retrieved 2008-11-24.

^ “Opportunities to engage in commercial low THC hemp fibre and seed production in NSW”. www.dpi.nsw.gov.au. Retrieved 2008-11-24.

^ “Hemp Industry Regulation 2008″. legislation.nsw.gov.a. Retrieved 2008-11-24.

^ “North Dakota Case”. Votehemp.com. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

^ “75th Oregon Legislative Assembly — 2009 Regular Session Senate Bill 676″. Leg.state.or.us. Retrieved 2011-04-20.

This page reproduces the article Hemp from Wikipedia®, pursuant to license. Select portions have been highlighted by SEN for purposes of emphasizing hemp’s pertinence to sustainability and to distinguish the topic of hemp from that of marijuana. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

 

The Battle Continues-Grand Canyon Update

Sharing information is a powerful tool — one of the most powerful tools for any campaign to have — a tool that I will keep using with the Worldwide Campaign to Save the Grand Canyon even now as public comments to the government have officially closed.

So now we wait. But we don’t have to wait quietly. We continue to have a voice and I, for one, will continue to use all at my disposal to keep the pressure on the “powers that be” to do (for a change) the right thing; not only environmentally, but morally.

Below is an article of interest — recommended reading to all.

As The Battle Continues Over Uranium Mining At The Grand Canyon, Most Arizonans Are Unaware That A Big Decision Is Looming

By John Guzzon – Modern Times Magazine .com

Whether one realizes it or not, the Grand Canyon impacts virtually every Arizonan every day. Millions visit the canyon every year to take in the natural beauty and to commune with the nature. But more importantly, much of the water that arrives in the Phoenix metropolitan area at one time flowed through the Grand Canyon thanks to the Colorado River.

Continue Reading »The Battle Continues-Grand Canyon Update

Ecofeminism: Book by Jytte Nhanenge

Ecofeminism:

Towards Integrating the Concerns of Women, Poor People, and Nature into Development

Authored by Jytte Nhanenge, whose book dedication reads             “In memory of the 50,000 people who are dying every day from effects of poverty in our world of plenty”

Sustainability Education Network is doubly honored to announce and review the newly published work of author Jytte Nhanenge, and applauds University Press of America for its recognition of the enormous value of her scholarship and 500+ pages.

We are honored first and foremost because Nhanenge’s seminal work is a worthy building upon the paradigm shift that for this reviewer commenced when he met Riane Eisler in San Diego in 1992 and read her book, The Chalice and the Blade. Riane Eisler (more below) has since rightly won worldwide acclaim, and her mission is — thank God — ever-expanding.

We are delighted with both works because we see them as being integrated – one building upon the other – and because the overall value of their proposed paradigm shift encompasses our own mission:

If we do not make the required changes in our perception of reality, in our knowledge system, in our institutions, and adjust the way we behave and relate to each other and to nature, then — to borrow the conclusion from Jytte Nhanenge’s book summary below –  “patriarchal domination will eradicate life on planet Earth”.

And that brings us to the reason we are doubly honored: To us Ms. Nhanenge is Jytte, a friend across thousands of miles, a caring human being, and one who in 2010 generously contributed to a collaborative effort of SEN and Care2 activists to halt the advance of Monsanto GMOs. She found the time, and we know it was not easily found. We here follow suit.

SEN Review of:  Ecofeminism: Towards Integrating the Concerns of Women, Poor People, and Nature into Development, by Jytte Nhanenge

This book should be read by everyone who sincerely cares about saving Mother Earth and all life dependent on it.  It is more than highly critical of modern society and its dominant institutions and knowledge system, which are subordinating society and exploiting nature in order to provide the elites with economic profit. By using an ecofeminist perspective, the book clarifies this tragic and unsustainable state of affairs as being a function of patriarchal domination, and explains its underlying concepts and roots. Despite its scholarship, every concept, theory, and idea presented is explained in plain English, making everything easy to understand.

Some readers are apt to be surprised about the totality of the book’s criticisms of the status quo, because it reveals flaws in science, economics, and technology about which most of us are largely unaware, and we have been conditioned to believe they are beneficial. However, upon reading the explanations in the book, one is treated to the “aha” or “lightbulb” moment, and realizes WHY science and economics and technology are beneficial to so few and detrimental to so many (ie why they are not working).

Other readers may initially despair, for thinking it impossible to correct all the many and pervasive problems identified. Again, however, we think any despair will quickly give over to hope and then positive energy as the “aha” and “lightbulb” moments  accumulate into a grand “Aha!”, as readers realize that underlying and common to all  the problems is the extreme focus on masculine, yang forces in modern society.  It becomes clear that including a good portion of feminine, yin energy will balance it all. Thus, it is reassuring that the book also suggests yin-yang harmonious alternatives, which are non-dominant and caring towards society and nature,  ie systems that address the needs of women, poor people, and nature.

Happily, the book delivers more than a basis of hope and positive energy for change. It dares to dream, presenting visions of a non-dominant world. It may be a world we only can dream about because we do not know it, but we need to start dreaming.

The book does not purport to deliver absolute truths as to specific solutions — absolute truths derive from fundamentalism, which is a patriarchal fallacy. Instead, the book promotes a diversity of possible changes and solutions.  It manifests this diversity in its integration of the wisdom of numerous highly respected thinkers and authors, including Albert Einstein, E. F. Schumacher, Fritjof Capra, Hazel Henderson, Vandana Shiva, Karen J. Warren, Val Plumwood, Noël Sturgeon, Ivone Gebara, Carolyn Merchant, Rachel Carson, James Robertson, Dorothy Rowe, Alice Miller, Paul Ekins, Robert Heilbroner, Irene Dankelman and Joan Davidson, Richard B. Norgaard, Janis Birkeland, Joseph R. Des Jardins, Marthinus Versfeld and many more.

The challenges we are facing in our troubled world are complex, a complexity this book clearly describes and yet renders understandable and soluble, it is therefore among the more important ecofeminism books published to date.  SEN therefore concludes its review as follows:

The book is a must reading for every literate person in the world; it is for those who are appreciative of scholarship; it is for those who want to understand the root causes of our present global crises; it is for those who want to improve their knowledge in order to increase their engagement in the current important discussions about necessary global changes;  it is for those who want to present their demands more eloquently to political leaders and media; it is for those who want real change and improvement in the quality of life for society and nature and who are fed up with the eternal focus on economic profit; and it is for those who are not yet completely impoverished by the greed of patriarchy and still have some funds available to buy the book*.

*If you are out of funds, I would urge you to ask your library to acquire it.

— Gregory Hilbert, Co-Founder SEN

– Suzanne Sparling, Co-Founder SEN

The book is available from (click to view) Roman and Littlefield and at a discount from Amazon. Please also see the Summary and Detailed Contents below.

The Author’s Summary of Ecofeminism: Towards Integrating the Concerns of Women, Poor People, and Nature into Development

This book is for those who desire to improve their understanding of the current crises of poverty, violence, environmental destruction, human rights abuses, and their causes. It is an ecofeminist analysis of modern society’s dualised, patriarchal structure. It is showing that reductionist, masculine, and quantitative (yang) perceptions inform science, economics, and technology, resulting in subordination of holistic, feminine, and qualitative (yin) values. This yin-yang imbalance manifests as patriarchal domination of women, poor people, and nature leading to the above crises. Since similar values inform Third World Development, also its activities are exploitative. Thus, rather than improving human well-being, development increases poverty and natural degradation in the South. Presently, modern patriarchy manifests in neo-liberal policies that promote “free” global economic markets and trades. The policies are generating huge profits to the political and economic elites, while having devastating results for societies and nature worldwide. Unless we increase our awareness and demand changes that balance the yang and yin forces, patriarchal domination will eradicate life on planet Earth. [Please see Detailed Contents toward bottom of page. - GH]

About Author Jytte Nhanenge
Jytte Nhanenge is a Danish citizen who has been working with development in Africa for many years. She decided to find out what is wrong with development, as she was
troubled about development’s inability to alleviate poverty. Nhanenge embarked on a lengthy study and discusses the outcome in her book. It’s scholarship is solidly grounded in the dissertation she wrote as part of her Masters of Art Degree in International Development Studies at the University of South Africa (UNISA), in Pretoria, South Africa. Jytte lives with her husband in Mozambique.

About Riane Eisler
Riane Eisler is an Austrian-born American scholar, writer, and social activist whose family fled from the Nazis when she was a child. She has degrees in sociology and law, and is president of the Center for Partnership Studies. Eisler’s international bestseller The Chalice and The Blade: Our History, Our Future was hailed by anthropologist Ashley Montagu as “the most important book since Darwin’s Origin of Species.” Her 2008 book, The Real Wealth of Nations: Creating a Caring Economics, proposes a new approach to economics that gives visibility and value to the most essential human work: the work of caring for people and the planet. Archbishop Desmond Tutu described it as “a template for the better world we have been so urgently seeking.”

Ms. Eisler, I will shortly be sending you a letter of my own introduction written by another well-known American woman, Mary Eisenhower, Ike’s grand-daughter and Executive Directive of the People to People International he founded. Suffice it to say here that she was among a group of leaders who honored me with a wonderful sword they dubbed Excalibur. Yes, a BLADE! My purpose, however, is to obtain your consideration of Jytte Nhanenge’s work, which I believe most worthy of your encouragement.     — Gregory Hilbert

Detailed Contents of Ecofeminism: Towards Integrating the Concerns of Women, Poor People and Nature into Development

Copyright 2011, University Press of America, All Rights Reserved.

Chapter 1: Aspects of the Crises in the World: The Crisis of War and Violence: Investments, Costs, and Results; The Price of War: Resources Spent on Military and War The Losses of War: Effects of War on Women, Children, and Nature; The Trade of War: Global Arms Trade Is the Biggest; The Futility of War: More and Better Weapons Do Not Secure Peace; Militarization and Social Inequality Increase Violence and Crime; The Crisis of Poverty and Inequality: Lack of Effective Solutions; Poverty, Sickness, and Death: Effects on Women and Children; Development: The Failed Strategy to Alleviate Poverty; The Problem of North-South, Male-Female Inequality; The Crisis of Environmental Destruction: Main Threats, Main Victims; Climate Change; Acid Rain; Ultraviolet Radiation; Deforestation and Desertification; Extinction of Species; Water Scarcity; Dangerous Industries: Their Pollution and Waste; Development: Its Destructive Ecological Consequences; The Crisis of Human Rights Abuses: Main Issues, Main Victims; The Value of Money Is a Priority Over the Value of People; Women’s Rights Are Human Rights, in Theory; Slavery and Human Trafficking; The Root Cause of the Crises: A Perceptual, Intellectual Crisis;  Modernity: A Reductionist Perception of Reality; Alternatives: A Systemic Approach to the Crises.

Chapter 2: Perspectives for Transforming the Crises: Cultural Transformation: From Western Crises to Eastern Opportunities; I Ching: What It Is and How It May Promote Cultural Transformation;  The Yin and the Yang: Interdependent Parts of a Whole Person; Applying Harmonious Yin-Yang to Unbalanced Western Society; The Systems Theory and Smuts’ Holism: Ecologic Ontologies; General Systems Theory, Smuts’ Holism: Environmental Thinking; Compared to Western, Patriarchal Culture.

Chapter 3: Ecofeminism: What It Is and Why It Is Important: What Is Ecofeminism; History; Positions; A Theory-in-process; Conceptual Framework and Philosophy; The Logic of Domination; The Logic of Value Dualism; Patriarchy; Environmental Ethics; Critiques of Mainstream Ethics; An Ecofeminist Environmental Ethics; An Ecofeminist Social Justice; Social Ecology; Deep Ecology; Radical Environmental Theories and Their Cooperation; Ecofeminism and Post-modernism; Ecofeminism: A Perspective beyond Post-modernism; Ecofeminist Spiritualities; Criticism of Ecofeminism and Response; Ecofeminist Movements.

Chapter 4: An Ecofeminist Analysis of Science, Economics, and Technology: The Origin of the Domination of Women, Others, and Nature; Science: The Foundation in Development; Part I: Modern Science: Its Domination of Women, Others, and Nature; The Scientific Revolution: From a Living World to a Dead Machine; The Scientific Revolution: Important Events for Nature and Women; The Early Domination of Nature; Tension between the Organic and the Mechanical Ideals; Nature Is Like Woman: Chaotic, Unpredictable, Disorderly; Women and Nature Are Inferior to Men and Culture; Superior, Public Man—Inferior, Private Woman; Passive, Emotional Woman Is Secondary to Active, Rational Man; The Men Who Created the Scientific Paradigm; Plato’s Hierarchical Dualism; The Copernican Revolution; Francis Bacon: The Father of Modern Science; René Descartes: Nature Is Dead: The World Is a Machine; Isaac Newton: Putting Theory into Practice; Society Is also a Machine; Mechanism: The Modern Way of Life; Science: An Ideology Founded on Power and Domination; Science Is Violent; Alternative to Mechanical Science; New Physics Declares the Universe Alive; The Relativity Theory and the Quantum Theory; Science Can Only Yield Approximate Knowledge; An Example of Systemic Thinking; Critique of New Science: It Cannot Overcome Dualism; Finally Overcoming Dualism! A Unified, Interdependent, and Harmonious Worldview; A Synthesis of Diverse Perspectives and Worldviews; Part II: Scientific Economics: Its Domination of Women, Others, and Nature; The Emergence of Economics as a Truth about the World; Economics Values Profit Over Society and Nature; Prices Are Objectively Derived; Nature and Society Are Externalized Anomalies;  Economic Efficiency: To Destroy Nature and Society; The “Free” Market: Excluding the Needs of People and Nature; Private Profit Is Reaped on Public Costs; Economics Values Quantity of Money Over Quality of Life; Cost-benefit Analysis: Ignoring Social and Natural Values; Unlimited Economic Growth Will End Human Life on Earth; GNP Does Not Bring Happiness, Health, and Well-being; Economics Values Masculine Forces Over Feminine Forces; Individualism Leads to Self-destruction; Denial of Emotions Leads to Greed and Domination; Economics: Exploiting Human Emotions and Social Norms;   Capitalism: A Dominant Regime That Generates Poverty; Denial of Ethics and Wisdom Leads to Greed and War; The Psychological Meaning of Money and Power; The Domination of the New Global Capitalism; Structural Adjustment: Domination of Women-Others-Nature ; A Feminist Critique of Structural Adjustment; Structural Adjustment’s Impact on Women and Nature; Neo-liberal Economic Development: A Third World War; NEPAD: A Future of Increased Domination; The Corporation: A Psychopathic, Legal Destroyer of Society; Alternatives to Scientific Economics; Requirements for a New Economics;   Alternative Economic Thinkers; Economics for Women, Others, and Nature; Part III: Scientific Technology: Its Domination of Women, Others, and Nature; Technology: The Means by Which Man Controls Nature; Modern Technology: Leading to Social and Natural Crises; Technology Is Not Neutral but Value-laden; Technology Values Profit Over Society and Nature; Technology Values Hardware Over Software; Technology Values Violence Over Peace and Harmony; Biotechnology: The Means to Control Life Itself ; Biotechnology: Colonizing the Reproductive Powers of Nature; Biotechnology: Effects on Society and Nature: Unknown; Biotechnology: Patenting All Life Forms and Processes; Controlling Regeneration of Nature and Women; Appropriate Technology; Intermediate Technology; Nature and Society Friendly Technologies.

Chapter 5: An Ecofeminist Analysis of Development:
Part I: Development: A Discourse of Power and Domination; The United Nations Four Development Decades; The Discourse that Created the Underdeveloped Third World; Catching-up Development: A Neo-colonial Invention; Scientism and Developmentalism: A Violent Combination; Statism, Scientism, Developmentalism: Absolute Power and Control; Developmentalism: A Dualised, Masculine Perspective; Development: The Source of Poverty and Deprivation; Development: A Male-dominant, Gender-blind Project; Development Breeds Violence, Destruction, and Death; Ecofeminism and Post-development; The Arguments of Two Post-development Writers; Critique of Post-development and Response; Part II: Empirical and Socio-economic Links between the  Domination of Women, Others, and Nature; Rural Women’s Living Condition in the South; The Framework of Vandana Shiva’s Analysis; Women and Food Production; Women and Water Management; Women and the Forests; Women’s Energy Crisis; Women and Education; Conclusion on Southern Women’s Relationship to Nature; Ecological Grassroots Movements: Chipko and Green Belt;  The Chipko Movement of India; The Green Belt Movement of Kenya; Some Conclusions on Southern Ecological Movements; Shiva’s Work: Critique, Response, and Conclusion; Critique of Shiva’s Work; Shiva’s Response to the Critique, and Conclusion; Part III: Women, Environment, and Sustainable Development:  An Ecofeminist Intervention into the Development Debate; The Discourse on Women in Development; The Emergence of Ecofeminism in the WED Debate; Events That Led to the Rise of the WED Debate; The Diverse Stands in the WED Debate; Critique of and Response to the Ecofeminist Intervention; The “Ecofeminist Moment” in the Development Discourse; Women’s Environmental and Development Organisation; The Workshop “Women and Children First”; The Conference “Women and Environment—Partners in Life”; “The World Women’s Congress for a Healthy Planet”; The Conference “Roots of the Future”; The UN Conference on Environment and Development; The Results from the Earth Summit; The Outcome of the Global Forum; Diverse Ecofeminist Discourse in Third World Development; Third World Development Is an Ecofeminist Concern; Ecofeminist Analysis of Development Activities;

Chapter 6: Ecofeminist Thoughts on a Possible Non-dominant World:  “The Way Things Could Have Been”: A Whole, Interrelated, Mutual Person; Why It Is Important to Redefine the Concept of “a Person”; “A Person,” as Defined by Patriarchalism; “A Person,” as Defined by Ecofeminism; A New Definition of a Person Requires a New Ethics; A Whole, Experiential, and Contextual Epistemology; Opening Up Epistemology to Gender and Ecology; Human Experience: The Guiding Principle of Knowing; Knowing Is a Matter of Interdependence; Knowing Is Holistic—Knowing Is a Process; Knowledge Is Situated and Contextual; Knowledge Is Affective; Knowledge Is Inclusive; Ecofeminist Epistemology Is Relevant Knowledge; Lasting Peace: A Non-dominant Society That Cares for Its Children; Patriarchal Domination of Children; The Motives for Dominating Children; The Consequences from Traditional Child Rearing ; Adolf Hitler: The Abused Child, the Cruel Adult; Children Suffer: Society Turns Its Head and Looks the Other Way; The Way to Forgiveness of Childhood Abuse; Awareness May Bring about a Peaceful World; Building Sustainable, Non-domineering, Non-dualised Societies; A Future without the “Isms of Domination”; Reconnecting Humanity to the Web of Life; An Ecofeminist Development: Liberating Women and Nature

Chapter 7:  Summary, Conclusion, and Recommendations: [As we said: "Must reading", and we hope the author's conclusions and recommendations are read far and wide! --SEN]

Turtle Island: Our Earth Mother

Japan in Crisis

By Sheryl Goodwin, SEN Contributor and Honorary Advisor

Kway. Hello. First off let me state what an Honor it is to be asked by my brother Gregory and sister Suzanne to join the team. What a privilege to be among such fine people listed on the biography page of Sustainability Education Network. I know we are all missing our brother Hugh, upon the Earth Walk, with his words of wisdom that came from a heart of deep love, but we are grateful he was able to be with us for the amount of time he was. What lovely gifts he was able to leave for each of us and I hope for those who have not yet been able will take the time to check out his writings within the archives.

My writing style may vary from time to time but I always keep in mind that I‘m speaking to my brothers and sisters upon Turtle Island. I like to write in such a way that it would appear you and I were sitting across the kitchen table from each other, having a favorite beverage of some type and chatting. Although miles may be between us and we may not see each other in the physical sense, our words reflect our very beings, so in that respect we do meet.

There are many issues and events that are taking place across this Earth, as I write this, events that affect each one of us personally. Some of those events we seem to be aware of in subtle ways and others we do not seem to concern ourselves as greatly as we should unless they knock more forcefully upon our lives. The event that is playing out currently as I write concerns the earthquake in Japan.

We have seen the great forces of our Mother as she moves and shifts her position, as she sighs, and settles back to rest again. We need to remember, like ourselves, she is alive, she breathes, she moves too and we live upon her. As with our own bodies we move to change positions. Sometimes we move to do something, or to get away from something, this could be to make ourselves more comfortable or when there is an irritation of some type taking place. How might we be causing an irritation to our Earth Mother? Is she moving in a natural rhythm or is she moving because she is irritated?

From her movements other natural occurrences have taken place in the form of a tsunamie which has caused great damage. Those are natural movements upon our Earth Mother but we need to guide our lives and our actions to live in harmony with her on a more reflective and enlightened way. People gather and work in large numbers right upon the shores of known areas of earthquakes and tsunami areas. Is that wise to do so? The other issue at hand is the Nuclear Plant built right in an area prone to earthquakes and tsunamis that has caused a third occurrence, this one is man made. We as a species of humans need to consider what we do and how we do it, and is it a wise way to do things.

Great lessons are given to us over the historic life of each and every one of us. Our species has the ability to record historical conditions that go back to a past that we have not lived ourselves personally, but we can still learn from past events that our ancestors experienced. So what do we do with those lessons? Do we learn from them or repeat the same mistakes over and over again, and now with even more dire consequences. We must as a collective, of brothers and sisters to one another realize that we all share the same home upon Turtle Island and that it is all our responsibility to keep our home clean and in good order for us to remain in balance and harmony upon the living Being that we reside.

I thank each one of you who took the time to read my first article for Sustainability Education Network and I look forward to sharing more conversations with each of you.

Please feel free to send me your thoughts and feelings upon the matter as we all need to hold dialogue on these important issues that concern each living Being upon this Turtle Island.

Remember, we are not just brothers and sisters to our fellow human Beings but we are also related to our four legged Beings. The swimmers, the creepy crawlers, the Plant Nations and the winged ones all share Turtle Island with us. We are all made from the same Earth Mother and we breath the same life giving air; we absorb the same life giving energies that the sun rays offer us. So with that I’d like to offer a video made by the Hopi Nation to reflect upon and may we join in to offer our healing thoughts in whatever manner is comfortable from our own self.

Mitakuye Oyasin
We Are All Related
We Are Related to All

YouTube Preview Image

Week 2 – Worldwide Campaign to Save the Grand Canyon

Grand Canyon ~ Photo Credit: ©Ferenc Cegledi/BIGSTOCKPHOTO ~ The global significance of the Grand Canyon's natural features prompted UNESCO to declare it a World Heritage Site in 1979.

On August 18, 2010, SEN4Earth kicked off our Worldwide Campaign to Save the Grand Canyon. A critical part of the campaign includes two petitions, one on Change.org and one at ThePetitionSite.com.

The Grand Canyon is one of the world’s most pristine and majestic treasures. Mother Nature needs our help to save it! We all need to act to protect the Grand Canyon. Pledge to do your part! Help us by adding your signature to the petitions and ask everyone you know and who cares for earth to do the same. We urge you to sign all the petitions you can to help stop the mining and environmental destruction to this worldly treasure permanently – it’s time for action to be taken to save the Grand Canyon!

Save the Grand Canyon ~ Take Action! ~ Click here to Sign SEN’s Petition at Care2′s ThePetitionSite!

Click here to Sign the Petition on Change.org

Our Worldwide Campaign to Save the Grand Canyon article was cross-posted on the Care2 News Network where within just a few short hours, it rocketed to the top most noted and active issue in environment. We are grateful to all who have noted that article on Care2, and helped to spread the word through other social networks. We continue to ask for and need your help to raise awareness far and wide about this campaign and urge family and friends to sign both petitions.

Grand Canyon overlook ~ Photo Credit: © Christophe Testi/ISTOCKPHOTO ~ The Colorado River appears as a vibrant green ribbon winding through the more muted tan, gray, and terra cotta-colored canyon walls.

“The truth is it’s such an incredible place, and it’s worth making sure we give it the best and most thoughtful concerns,” he said. “Hopefully, we’ll be able to take care of it for the long haul. As time goes on, parks will become more valuable to everyone.”

_____________________

Save the Grand Canyon ~ Take Action! ~ Click here to Sign SEN’s Petition at Care2′s ThePetitionSite!

Click here to Sign the Petition on Change.org

On the heals of the kick-off of SEN’s Worldwide Campaign to Save the Grand Canyon, a recent post on the Grand Canyon Trust’s blog discusses the newly released comprehensive study by the NPCA highlighting the opportunities and challenges facing Grand Canyon National Park, as well as policy recommendations for preserving and protecting this national treasure in the future.

NPCA’s Southwest Regional Director David Nimkin stated,

Photo Credit: Mark Lellouch/National Park Service ~ In prehistoric times, granaries were built high along the rock faces of Marble Canyon. These and other archaeological remains are evidence of various cultural groups that have lived within the Grand Canyon. Operations of Glen Canyon Dam can affect archeological resources along the Colorado River and side canyons; park archaeologists monitor these effects and develop remediation plans when necessary.

“National parks connect Americans to our national heritage and protect the natural landscapes that help to define us. Our new report highlights the challenges facing the Grand Canyon, many of which also affect other national park sites nationwide.”

Ron Tipton, NPCA’s Senior Vice President for Policy shared,

“National parks face many challenges – the impacts of climate change, multiple sources of air pollution, competition for water, loss of habitat, and insufficient funding to support basic park operations. We must ensure our American treasures are preserved and protected, unimpaired, for future generations to enjoy.”

Of particular note from Roger Clark of the Grand Canyon Trust,

“Grand Canyon National Park is a global icon and the many challenges found at the park are reflected in all our national parks.” [emphasis added]

We couldn’t agree with you more Mr. Clark! This is why we here at SEN4Earth have initiated this campaign as a WORLDWIDE mission to provide support to Save the Grand Canyon and its surrounding areas.

Save the Grand Canyon ~ Take Action! ~ Click here to Sign SEN’s Petition at Care2′s ThePetitionSite!

Click here to Sign the Petition on Change.org

In a quote from the Arizona Republic article of August 24, Mr. Clark stated,

Photo Credit: Alan Levine ~ The Orphan Mine, which produced copper, other precious metals, and uranium, is adjacent to the popular South Rim Trail. Fencing protects visitors from contact with the potentially harmful materials left over from mining activity.

“At least 100 mines that are 20 acres or larger will be operating in and around the Canyon in the next 20 years.” This is a very real threat to life in and around the park and surrounding areas. As has been also determined, mines threaten the watershed with the risk of uranium or mining waste seeping into the Colorado River, a source of drinking water for more than 20 million people downstream.”

Save the Grand Canyon ~ Take Action! ~ Click here to Sign SEN’s Petition at Care2′s ThePetitionSite!

Click here to Sign the Petition on Change.org

Seize BP Demonstrations Nationwide

Demonstrations Continue Next Week

Click Here to Find A Demonstration Near You

Demand Seizure of BP’s assets!

 

Click Here for SEN’s Gulf Oil Disaster Action Central and 35 Petitions. Sign One or All!

Click Here to Tell Salazar What You Think About Palin’s Lunatic Latest!

Background re Seize BP Demonstrations: The Seize BP Campaign is garnering media attention nationwide! On June 3, CNN featured the Seize BP Week of Action on television. “We know millions of people are deeply concerned about what’s going on in the Gulf right now, and we expect large numbers of people to come out to the protests,” a Seize BP organizer told CNN.

People across the country are mobilizing to demand more decisive action! SEN believes these demonstrations will help awaken politicians to outrage over inadequate regulation and control of international corporations, even if they do not succeed in gaining temporary seizure of BP on the basis of national emergency and evidence of criminal neglect and fraud by BP.

Demonstrations scheduled as of June 16 are listed below, but the link above for the latest:

WASHINGTON, D.C.
Wednesday, June 16, 12 noon
White House
while Obama meets
with BP executives

LOS ANGELES
Thursday, June 17, 5 pm
CNN Building
6430 Sunset Blvd.

NEW ORLEANS
Friday, June 18 at 4:30 pm
Protest at Halliburton Offices
601 Canal St.

YouTube Preview Image

Gulf Oil Disaster Action Central

YouTube Preview ImageThe Gulf Oil Disaster is the Latest Symptom of the Madness Being Unleashed on Mother Earth, Mankind, Wildlife and Life Itself

SEN below has posted links to many actions you can take. Visit often, more will arise in coming weeks.

Click Any or All Sites Below to Act Now

Do Not Donate to Environmental Defense Fund!
Read why SEN has condemned EDF. SEN observes that EDF now lists the efforts of other orgs on the EDF crisis-response page, and yet seizes the opportunity to ask for donations to be added to its own $100 million coffers! EDF’s coffers are already filled with payments from corporations it helps greenwash!

New Actions Will Be Added Above As We Find Them

Below Are News Updates and Articles on BP, Oil Drilling, Clean Energy and Energy-Climate Legislation

 

 

Petróleo del Golfo de Desastres Central de Acción   Action du Golfe en cas de catastrophe central au fuel      海灣石油災害行動中   Gulf Oil Central de Acção de Desastres   Галф ойл опасности действий Центральной   Gulf Oil Ramp Actie Centraal   الخليج العمل من الكوارث النفط الوسطى   Gulf Oil Disaster działania Centralnego    Minyak Teluk Bencana Tengah Aksi    אסון גאלף אויל מרכז פעילות   Gulf Oil Δράση Καταστροφών της Κεντρικής   Golf Olie Ramp Aksie Sentrale   खाड़ी के तेल आपदा केन्द्रीय लड़ाई      ガルフオイル災害アクションセントラル

Users Are Invited to Enter Comments or Action Links Below, Visit Other Areas of SEN, to Enter Prayers on Hug Spiritual Trees, and Enter Themselves or Beloved Family or Wildlife in our Book of Life

Citizens Get It Right on Care2

SEN below reproduces and commends select comments on the thread of a Care2 Post by Just

Many of the comments below were posted by Care2 friend Robert S (who credits certain of them to Huffington’s Linda Keenan) and several by Marion, Just, Bev, Dandelion, Jelica and other Care2 friends.

There is no verbal hyperbole sufficient to express the magnitude of the environmental catastrophe now known as Deepwater Horizon. It is nothing short of an Armageddon of Oil. Assuming we even survive this one, we must immediately mobilize a crash program for truly renewable alternative energy resources.

This THE CRIME OF THE CENTURY! All those Armani wearing BP and Haliburton execs.,along with greedy, corrupt government officials who took lobby $$$$$$$ to turn a blind eye to safty, should be made to drag their sorry as*es down there and help with this catastrophy.Having said that we are accomplices in this because of our addiction to power as described in the documentary “Future Earth: Addicted to Power“. There will be many more catastrophies to come if WE do not all start living more simply, or it will be forced on us. Also a ROOT CAUSE of our planets destruction is our CULTURE OF CONSUMERISM, a news story I posted a couple of weeks ago about our out of control desire to want, want, want. “ I`d like more things please“ The next catastrophy may be aging the N.E. power grid. It is so crucial it can not be rerouted to do repairs, and men in helicopters must do repairs on live cables. Not an environmental catastrophy, but the scenario would be a catastrophe no less. If we do not start living more simply, it will be forced on us.

We are boldly going nowhere.

Maybe now folks will start riding their bikes, using their vehicles for only the most necessary trips, create a disaster preparedness plan, grow a garden, work with our communities for sustainability, get off the grid and tell the DRILL, BABY, DRILL crowd to go to hell! We only need the basics: food, water, air and shelter. All of these areas are now threatened because of greed, immorality, power and profits. It’s all B.S. Maybe now we can start getting our priorities in order.

As with so many other things there needs to be a total disaster of major porportions to get any change to come about. Well we’ll have change all right, will be years of suffering for many before this mess gets straightened out. Lots of change with lost jobs, dead animals, destroyed wetlands, polluted beaches, droughts, and who knows what else.
Until everyone “gets it” that there is a web of life around the world, that what happens in one place affects something else, which in turn affects something else.
I have so been looking forward to returning to Florida to be back among friends I had made down there, guess there will be no time for chilling out once I am there for I’ll have to hit the beaches and see if any animals can be saved. Well I hope these greedy jerks are satisfied now, they got oil alright, there will be oil everywhere one doesn’t want it.
Where are these “Drill Baby Drill” people now? Are they out there saving birds, will they offer one of those shrimp fisherman a job or help to pay their bills due to lost wages. Will we even have a shrimp industy again once this is materialized.
Now will we as a Country get serious about CLEAN energy sources? Or do we wait until there is nothing left at all on this Earth for living creatures, including ourselves.

Rachel Maddow (MSNBC) interviewed Dr. Overton, an environmental scientist at LSU. He said they really don’t know how this thing will turn out. It will be bad, he said. It could be “extremely devastating” as he put it. Hurricane season begins in June. This couldn’t have happened at a worse time. We want answers, but Dr. Overton said they are just now “trying to figure this thing out.” Overton said the oil gusher could go on for 3 to 6 months. It could also go on for 9 months. He was not encouraging.

The unrelenting drive for oil has reached the deepest regions of the Amazon rainforest – and as we write this note, the Canadian oil company Talisman Energy is beginning the drilling of exploratory wells in the ancestral homeland of the Achuar people. For decades the Achuar have opposed oil development in their lands.

BP has figured out a very low-cost way to prepare for this task: BP lies. BP prevaricates, BP fabricates and BP obfuscates. That’s because responding to a spill may be easy and simple, but not at all cheap. And BP is cheap. Deadly cheap. To contain a spill, the main thing you need is a lot of rubber, long skirts of it called a “boom.” Quickly surround a spill, leak or burst, then pump it out into skimmers, or disperse it, sink it or burn it. Simple. But there’s one thing about the rubber skirts: you’ve got to have lots of them at the ready, with crews on standby in helicopters and on containment barges ready to roll. They have to be in place round the clock, all the time, just like a fire department, even when all is operating A-O.K. Because rapid response is the key. In Alaska, that was BP’s job, as principal owner of the pipeline consortium Alyeska. It is, as well, BP’s job in the Gulf, as principal lessee of the deepwater oil concession. Before the Exxon Valdez grounding, BP’s Alyeska group claimed it had these full-time, oil spill response crews. Alyeska had hired Alaskan natives, trained them to drop from helicopters into the freezing water and set booms in case of emergency. Alyeska also certified in writing that a containment barge with equipment was within five hours sailing of any point in the Prince William Sound. Alyeska also told the state and federal government it had plenty of boom and equipment cached on Bligh Island. But it was all a lie. On that March night in 1989 when the Exxon Valdez hit Bligh Reef in the Prince William Sound, the BP group had, in fact, not a lick of boom there. And Alyeska had fired the natives who had manned the full-time response teams, replacing them with phantom crews, lists of untrained employees with no idea how to control a spill. And that containment barge at the ready was, in fact, laid up in a drydock in Cordova, locked under ice, 12 hours away.As a result, the oil from the Exxon Valdez, which could have and should have been contained around the ship, spread out in a sludge tide that wrecked 1,200 miles of shoreline.

Cementing a deep-water drilling operation is a process fraught with danger. A 2007 study by the U.S. Minerals Management Service found that cementing was the single most important factor in 18 of 39 well blowouts in the Gulf of Mexico over a 14-year period — more than equipment malfunction. Halliburton has been accused of a poor cement job in the case of a major blowout in the Timor Sea off Australia last August. An investigation is underway. According to experts cited in Friday’s Wall St. Journal, the timing of last week’s cement job in relation to the explosion — only 20 hours beforehand, and the history of cement problems in other blowouts “point to it as a possible culprit.” Robert MacKenzie, managing director of energy and natural resources at FBR Capital Markets and a former cementing engineer, told the Journal, “The initial likely cause of gas coming to the surface had something to do with the cement.” In its statement, the company said, “Halliburton originated oilfield cementing and leads the world in effective, efficient delivery of zonal isolation and engineering for the life of the well, conducting thousands of successful well cementing jobs each year.” The company, which was once headed by former Vice President Dick Cheney, has been in the media spotlight before — under under fire in recent years for its operations as a private contractor in Iraq.

Its funny, not really, that so many think that drill baby drill will help us be less dependant on oil.
ANY oil we drill/find/pump out, (at least that not released into our oceans)… goes on the world market. Not to some US stockpile used only by us. And we can never drill enough, Not even close, even if it were used only by us…U.S. So the only way we can stop being dependent on foreign oil, is to stop being dependent on oil.Those who are in power(have all the money) and those who represent them (Republicans..but some on both sides) depend on ignorance. Don’t let them. Don’t buy into the lie.

Shadow Elite: Think BP’s The Bad Guy? Think Bigger, Way Bigger. Coast Guard Captain leading hearings Wednesday: “It’s my understanding that [a blowout preventer is] designed to industry standard … manufactured by the industry, installed by the industry, with no government witnessing or oversight of the construction or installation. Is that correct?” Regional supervisor, federal regulator MMS: “That is correct…” That staggering statement of regulatory impotence was characterized this way by Sen. Bill Nelson in the Wall Street Journal: “If MMS wasn’t asleep at the wheel, it sure was letting Big Oil do most of the driving.” It is tempting to hope that Big Oil’s days in the driver’s seat are over, now that the Obama administration has ordered that the Minerals Management Service, which oversees offshore drilling, be split up, after critics said the agency was too close to the industry and had an inherent conflict of interest. Realists are highly skeptical. And in our view, it is shortsighted to focus public ire on one business and one massive, deadly disaster, even as HuffPost yesterday spoke to another whistle-blower alleging egregious practices. This story lays bare the far-reaching (and largely unnoticed) emasculation of government regulatory power, as it has succumbed to corporate agendas over the past several decades. Janines examines this, and other disturbing trends, in her book Shadow Elite.

Questions: 1) What exactly is the substance BP is currently spreading to “bind with the crude and sink it” 2) Is it biologically safe? 3) What does it cost? Who makes it? Here are some answers from the New York Times:
“So far, BP has told federal agencies that it has applied more than 400,000 gallons of a dispersant sold under the trade name Corexit and manufactured by Nalco Co., a company that was once part of Exxon Mobil Corp. and whose current leadership includes executives at both BP and Exxon.
Another 805,000 gallons of Corexit are on order, the company said, with the possibility that hundreds of thousands of more gallons may be needed if the well continues spewing oil for weeks or months.
But according to EPA data, Corexit ranks far above dispersants made by competitors in toxicity and far below them in effectiveness in handling southern Louisiana crude.
Of 18 dispersants whose use EPA has approved, 12 were found to be more effective on southern Louisiana crude than Corexit, EPA data show.”

I Just watched the attorney who is bringing the class action lawsuit against BP, Halliburton and TransOcean for the suvivors of the 11 dead men on the rig that exploded. He’s going for manslaughter charges. He said this will probably settle out of court because these corporations don’t want a trial with a jury that will hang them. The case against them is damning with the lax safety issues, no testing, no plan to stop this large a spew, failure to apply a safety feature, reporting the “spill” as much smaller than it actually is and so much more.

A comment I saw on a blog…”The connection between government and corporate corruption has never been so evident after the wall street bailouts and this oil spill disaster. People are angry at this greedy company and want action from the very people in government who helped make it happen and I am sure the politicians will respond by passing new meaningless legislation filled with loopholes protecting their corporate sponsors. The number of politicians actually working in the people’s interest is limited to a handful…”

Transocean dodges paying U.S. corporate taxes by locating its headquarters in Switzerland. By Zaid Jilani.Transocean, Ltd, the company that operates the Deepwater Horizon oil rig which recently exploded in the Gulf, is the “world’s biggest offshore drilling contractor.” The AP reports today that Transocean, after moving its headquarters from the U.S. to Zug, Switzerland, two years ago, paid a paltry 16 percent on its corporate income last year, less than half of the current American corporate income tax rate of 35 percent: In the foothills of the Swiss Alps four new steel-gray towers rise from what used to be a grassy field. One of them is home to Transocean Ltd., the world’s biggest offshore drilling contractor and owner of the Deepwater Horizon rig that exploded in the Gulf of Mexico, leading to one of the worst oil spills in history. Low taxes prompted the decision two years ago to move to landlocked Switzerland: The company paid 16 percent tax on its $4.4 billion global operating income last year. The regular corporate income tax in the United States stands at about 35 percent.The company, once based in Delaware, shifted its head office from the Cayman Islands, where it has been since 1999, to the central Swiss canton (state) of Zug. It joined other international corporations flocking there in search of tax advantages. Only a dozen of Transocean’s employees are physically located in Zug — more than 1,300 are based in Houston, Texas. A “2005 survey by research firm BAKBASEL found Zug had the lowest effective tax burden for companies and high earners of any Swiss canton, and far below that of other European countries or the United States.” Transocean is holding its shareholder meeting in Zug today, angering some residents. “We want them to stop deepwater drilling and to clean up the damage they caused in the Gulf of Mexico,” said Rupan Sivaganesan, a Green Party member of the cantonal parliament.

Experts: BP disaster spilling the equivalent of two Exxon Valdezes a week. By Brad Johnson on May 13, 2010.Based on “sophisticated scientific analysis of seafloor video made available Wednesday,” Steve Wereley, an associate professor at Purdue University, told NPR the actual spill rate of the BP oil disaster is about 3 million gallons a day — 15 times the official guess of BP and the federal government. Another scientific expert, Eugene Chiang, a professor of astrophysics at the University of California, Berkeley, calculated the rate of flow to be between 840,000 and four million gallons a day. These estimates mean that the Deepwater Horizon wreckage could have spilled about five times as much oil as the 12-million-gallon Exxon Valdez disaster, with relief only guaranteed by BP in three more months.

Alaska’s senior senator blocked legislation Thursday that would have dramatically increased liability caps on oil companies, in the wake of one of the industry’s biggest disasters. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) objected to a voice vote request by Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) on the bill, which would have spiked the maximum liability for oil companies after an oil spill from $75 million to $10 billion. The legislation has significant support from Democrats, and the White House has indicated it backs an increase in liability caps. Following the failure of his bill to come up for a vote, Menendez responded, “It’s straightforward, it’s common sense. Either you want to fully protect the small businesses, individuals and communities devastated by a man-made disaster — this is not a natural disaster; this is a man-made disaster — or you want to protect multibillion-dollar oil companies from being held fully accountable. Apparently there are some in the Senate who prefer to protect the oil companies.”

As I read of this disasters impact…as I behold what is, and what is likely, I thought of a meteor heading for us as we read reports and watch helplessly. Its impact is coming. Some people say that it can’t be stopped ever… or for months, and even if it stopped today, the golden bowl is broken. Chernobyl comes to mind. So, so much is and will be lost. It was beyond my ability to remain composed as I read this.

Robert ~ That last link you provided tells of a possibly horrific scenario if this hole from hell isn’t plugged up soon. I watched the news media cover this “spill” with seriousness, then move on to another story and laugh like they don’t have a care in the world. I’m deeply disturbed by what this disaster can mean for the Gulf Coast, possibly all Americans and even the world. I believe the media should be following this story like they did with 9/11 – unrelenting and giving worst case scenarios. We’re dealing with a dumbed down society of people who react strongly to the silliest of things…wrong color of lipstick, hurry home to watch Dancing with the Stars, and a fascination with celebrities. How will these people act when one day they are told our air, water and food supply has been badly compromised because of this disaster? Now is a good time to break these people in before we have another disaster to deal with – crazed citizens.

If you didn’t get a chance to watch Maddow tonight, you might check out the segments on her website. In one piece, she talks with someone about how — just last week — Obama has stopped the MMS from approving any more drilling until further notice. Guess what? Right after being told to stop, the MMS approved FIVE MORE DRILLING OPERATIONS. When confronted, the MMS spokesperson lied and said they did not do this. Yet, there it was on paper. The Bush Administration operated like the wild, wild west where laws were meant to be overlooked. These government agencies and corporations are so used to operating illegally, they can’t stop. If Obama doesn’t know how to act like a sheriff, he needs to give someone the authority to lock up any criminals who break the law like this.

Ian R. MacDonald, an oceanographer at Florida State University who is an expert in the analysis of oil slicks, said he had made his own rough calculations using satellite imagery. They suggested that the leak could “easily be four or five times” the government estimate, he said. “The government has a responsibility to get good numbers,” Dr. MacDonald said. “If it’s beyond their technical capability, the whole world is ready to help them.” Scientists said that the size of the spill was directly related to the amount of damage it would do in the ocean and onshore, and that calculating it accurately was important for that reason. BP has repeatedly said that its highest priority is stopping the leak, not measuring it. “There’s just no way to measure it,” Kent Wells, a BP senior vice president, said in a recent briefing. Yet for decades, specialists have used a technique that is almost tailor-made for the problem. With undersea gear that resembles the ultrasound machines in medical offices, they measure the flow rate from hot-water vents on the ocean floor. Scientists said that such equipment could be tuned to allow for accurate measurement of oil and gas flowing from the well. Richard Camilli and Andy Bowen, of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts, who have routinely made such measurements, spoke extensively to BP last week, Mr. Bowen said. They were poised to fly to the gulf to conduct volume measurements. But they were contacted late in the week and told not to come, at around the time BP decided to lower a large metal container to try to capture the leak. That maneuver failed. They have not been invited again.

The full story of the Deepwater Horizon blowout is still emerging. But it’s already obvious both that BP failed to take adequate precautions, and that federal regulators made no effort to ensure that such precautions were taken. For years, the Minerals Management Service, the arm of the Interior Department that oversees drilling in the gulf, minimized the environmental risks of drilling. It failed to require a backup shutdown system that is standard in much of the rest of the world, even though its own staff declared such a system necessary. It exempted many offshore drillers from the requirement that they file plans to deal with major oil spills.And it specifically allowed BP to drill Deepwater Horizon without a detailed environmental analysis. Surely, however, none of this — except, possibly, that last exemption, granted early in the Obama administration — surprises anyone who followed the history of the Interior Department during the Bush years. For the Bush administration was, to a large degree, run by and for the extractive industries — and I’m not just talking about Dick Cheney’s energy task force. Crucially, management of Interior was turned over to lobbyists, most notably J. Steven Griles, a coal-industry lobbyist who became deputy secretary and effectively ran the department. (In 2007 Mr. Griles pleaded guilty to lying to Congress about his ties to Jack Abramoff.) Given this history, it’s not surprising that the Minerals Management Service became subservient to the oil industry — although what actually happened is almost too lurid to believe. According to reports by Interior’s inspector general, abuses at the agency went beyond undue influence: there was “a culture of substance abuse and promiscuity” — cocaine, sexual relationships with industry representatives, and more. Protecting the environment was presumably the last thing on these government employees’ minds. Now, President Obama isn’t completely innocent of blame in the current spill. As I said, BP received an environmental waiver for Deepwater Horizon after Mr. Obama took office. It’s true that he’d only been in the White House for two and half months, and the Senate wouldn’t confirm the new head of the Minerals Management Service until four months later. But the fact that the administration hadn’t yet had time to put its stamp on the agency should haveled to extra caution about giving the go-ahead to projects with possible environmental risks. And it’s worth noting that environmentalists were bitterly disappointed when Mr. Obama chose Ken Salazar as secretary of the interior. They feared that he would be too friendly to mineral and agricultural interests, that his appointment meant that there wouldn’t be a sharp break with Bush-era policies — and in this one instance at least, they seem to have been right. In any case, now is the time to make that break — and I don’t just mean by cleaning house at the Minerals Management Service. What really needs to change is our whole attitude toward government. For the troubles at Interior weren’t unique: they were part of a broader pattern that includes the failure of banking regulation and the transformation of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, a much-admired organization during the Clinton years, into a cruel joke. And the common theme in all these stories is the degradation of effective government by antigovernment ideology.